[Asterisk-Users] Clustering

[Douglas Garstang]

Gabriel. We are using OSPF on our asterisk box. When an interface fails, OSPF switches the default route over to the other interface. :) Fortunately Polycom phones are smart enough to wait for the RTP stream to be re-established.
 
As for OpenSER vs SER... I'm not sure. It really shouldn't make much difference which is used.
 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Gabriel Afana [mailto:asterisk at gafana.com] 
	Sent: Sat 3/11/2006 6:26 PM 
	To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
	Cc: 
	Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Clustering
	
	

	Doug,
	    How did get the RTP stream to fail over in progress?
	
	    Also, you mentioned your using OpenSER.  Why did you choose this over
	the standard SER?
	
	- Gabe
	
	
	----- Original Message -----
	From: "Douglas Garstang" <dgarstang at oneeighty.com>
	To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
	<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>; "Asterisk Users Mailing
	List -Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
	Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 10:49 PM
	Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Clustering
	
	
	> We're doing this. Our Polycom phones point to a domain name that support
	SRV records which gives us a roughly even distribution of calls. We have
	OpenSER systems sitting in front of the phones. Each OpenSER system is
	configured with different primary/secondary/tertiary Asterisk boxes. When a
	phone registers with SER, it 'copies' the registration down to all the
	Asterisk systems.
	>
	> However, now that I find we allegedly could have used regexten on Asterisk
	to replicate the registrations (yet to see docs on how this works), that $8k
	we spent on systems for OpenSER suddenly seems like money not quite so well
	spent.
	>
	> Calls to the PSTN are routed from Asterisk back to the OpenSER proxies
	where it sends it to the PSTN gateway.
	>
	> Eventhough it all seems to work quite well, and using OSPF we have been
	able to actually fail an interface on a single OpenSER or Asterisk box and
	fail over an RTP stream (only a few seconds of dead air), due to the
	horrible Asterisk documentation, our main challenge has been in replicating
	phone registrations between the Asterisk systems.
	>
	> It would have been great if the Asterisk product was mature enough to
	support Realtime SIP for storing registrations from multiple Asterisk boxes.
	On the surface you'd think it's possible, but every one has a different
	opinion about whether it's technically shown to work.
	>
	> If your going to try and set up a HA Asterisk solution be prepared for a
	really tough time.
	>
	> Doug.
	>
	>
	>
	>
	>
	>
	> -----Original Message-----
	> From: Wai Wu [mailto:wwu at Calltrol.com]
	> Sent: Fri 3/10/2006 9:48 PM
	> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
	> Cc:
	> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Clustering
	>
	>
	> If all the sub-servers register themselves to the frontend load balancer
	and support reinvite, the load balancer can decide which server to send the
	call to based on the CPU utilizations of the call processing servers. I'm
	assuming all calls are voip calls here.
	>
	> -----Original Message-----
	> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
	[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Ron McCarthy
	> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 2:22 PM
	> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
	> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Clustering
	>
	>
	> Hello All,
	>
	> Ive been doing more and more research on trying to setup a cluster/load
	balancer for Asterisk. All the Asterisk boxes would be using a config that
	is the same between them all (via a DB), but we want one location to point
	the phones to, and from there that machine/device will send it to a Asterisk
	server so the call can be processed. I know you cant balance the whole call,
	ie: once the call is started the RTP stream has to go to the same server,
	but a new call could go to a different server if perhaps the 1st server was
	unreachable.
	>
	> Has anyone tried this, or got this to work? Ive been looking at using a
	Juniper Session Border Controller, but not sure if thats gonna do the trick,
	and then we also have SER..
	>
	> Any comments would be great!
	>
	> Thanks
	> Ron
	>
	>
	>
	
	
	----------------------------------------------------------------------------
	----
	
	
	> _______________________________________________
	> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
	>
	> Asterisk-Users mailing list
	> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
	>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
	>
	
	_______________________________________________
	--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
	
	Asterisk-Users mailing list
	To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
	   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
	

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 7946 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060311/107de6ca/attachment.bin