[Asterisk-Users] Which ATA to test T.38 ? What about Linksys 3102

[Peder at NetworkOblivion]

When I looked several months ago, the only Sipura that supported T.38 
was the SPA-2100.  I haven't searched in a while, but I think it is 
still true.  We go directly from a Cisco gateway to the SPA-2100 and it 
works great.  It is the only ATA that we've seen that works right.


Joshua Colp wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Olivier
> [mailto:oza-4h07 at myamail.com]
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
> Non-Commercial Discussion [mailto:asterisk-users at lists.digium.com]
> Sent:
> Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:18:29 -0300
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Which ATA to test
> T.38 ? What about Linksys 3102
> 
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> Which ATA supporting T.38 would you recommend (for reliability) ?
>> Has anyone experienced this one ?
>>
>> http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Linksys-Cisco+3102
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
> 
> Hello There,
> 
> I know that during our testing for T.38 capability in trunk Matt (the person who was doing the testing) went through the Grandstream ATAs initially and could not get them to work. Thanks to a generous donation he then moved onto trying with Sipura ATAs instead and they worked great so I would assume that the 3102 would also work nicely. Sipura (should I call them Linksys now?) have done a good job on their SIP stack and appear to have done a good job on their T.38 implementation too. If you do end up giving them a try, definitely report back so others will have some feedback.
> 
> Have a great day!
> 
> Joshua Colp
> Digium
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> 

-- 

Network stuff you didn't know....
http://www.networkoblivion.com