[asterisk-users] Re: $3,000 server

[Harvey Miller]

Hmmmm I bet Jeremy needs a full time lawyer. Making a true statement is not
a problem as long as it is true. And this list is for what sort of chatter?
A word Jeremy knows from his legal woes is: DISCOVERY. Ahhh yes, the legal
venue where you get to ask Mr FonGuy questions. So Jeremy, if someone says
you have shit for brains it will then be up to you to prove that you do not.
Hmmm.


Please leave the building.




On 7/12/06, Derek Whitten <derek at kfuq.net> wrote:
>
> Don wrote:
> > You know I like this list for questions and answers...not spam about
> > other people's personal problems...
> > No one gives a shit about anything but asterisk here....go away...
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Workman"
> > <mworkman at imbroadcasting.net>
> > To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'"
> > <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:35 PM
> > Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Re: $3,000 server
> >
> >
> >> Yee PLEASE DO.... You don't know what your in for... ALL
> >> EMAILS/IRC/MSN/YAHOO is Logged...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> >> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy
> >> McNamara
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:26 PM
> >> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> >> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Re: $3,000 server
> >>
> >> Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> >>> He is not doing a very good job, Jeremy. For starters I sincerely
> >>> doubt he actually paid anyone $3,000. He sounds like somebody just
> >>> trying to defame NuFone for the fun of it. Also, the more he writes,
> >>> the more I think he's an idiot (much like Robert). He clearly shows
> >>> his lack of intelligence in his e-mails. I wouldn't pay anyone $3,000
> >>> without first having written confirmation of the work that will be
> >>> performed, who and where the person works, and other accompanying info
> >>> to avoid being "ripped off".
> >>
> >>
> >> I agree, but I could not stand for any more of this blatant disregard
> for
> >> the truth.
> >>
> >>
> >> Now it is time for the legal types to get involved so the truth can be
> >> discovered and disclosed in a proper forum.
> >>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060712/b3805702/attachment.htm