[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk with SuSe 10

[Lee Archer]

Thanks, I've got it running on my test box but didn't know if there was
any global objection to using it.  I've had a few funnies with it but
that might be down to Supermicro and P4's with the EM64T thing.

Regards

Lee 

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ben Klang
Sent: 24 January 2006 15:49
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk with SuSe 10

On Tuesday 24 January 2006 09:26, Lee Archer wrote:
> Has anyone had any experience with the Asterisk on a SuSe 10 platform?
> I'm currently using FC3 but because we use SuSe within other parts of 
> the business I'm being pushed to changed the OS.
Just about all of my production Asterisk servers are on SuSE 9.3.  My
development and demo boxes are SuSE 10.  Both run great.  I do however
usually tweak the RPM that came with it to add in a few patches.  If you
are comfortable with running Asterisk 1.0.9 then the RPM works very
well.  SuSE always seems to really think things through when they
package applications.

For running something newer than Asterisk 1.0.9 SuSE 10 is also works
fine.  
For your own sanity you'll want to not install/uninstall the SuSE
Asterisk RPMs.  One possible gotcha: be careful of possibly conflicting
kernel modules in /lib/modules/`uname -r`/extra as the Zaptel drivers
are not part of any Asterisk package but rather the kernel.  The zaptel
compile from source installs modules to /lib/modules/`uname -r`/misc so
you'll want to delete the files in extra.  You'll also have to remember
that each time you update the kernel RPM.

Hope that helps.  The bottom line from me is Thumbs Up.

/BAK/
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users