[Asterisk-Users] Re: Asterisk Development and Release Cycle

[Steven]

OK,  so if I were using SVN, the stable branch would still be changing and my problem was that I was using the Tarballs? Correct?



-- 
-- 
Steven

May you have the peace and freedom that come from abandoning all hope of having a better past.
---    -      ---  - - -       -    -     -   -   --  - - - --- - ------   - - --- - - -- -  -    - --   -   -    -
"Tony Mountifield" <tony at softins.clara.co.uk> wrote in message news:dqt28i$com$1 at softins.clara.co.uk...
> In article <dqs09a$i5p$1 at sea.gmane.org>,
> Steven <asterisk at tescogroup.com> wrote:
>> This is great news.
>
> Agreed!
>
>> Previously, stable was just considered a snapshot and if you ran
>> stable and encountered a bug, you had to switch to head to get the
>> fix.
>
> I don't think this is correct. Pure bug fixes were always applied to the
> "stable" 1.0 branch. Where you needed to use "head" was if you wanted to
> use the cool new features that were never going into 1.0.
>
> Cheers
> Tony
> -- 
> Tony Mountifield
> Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk
> Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>