[Asterisk-Users] "Decent" sub-$100 SIP phone.

[Joash Herbrink]

Ken,

 

I have good experience with the alcatel speedtouch 2020 and 2030 phones.

Should be under 100$ we sell them for about 88 euro (ex. VAT) here in
the Netherlands.

 

joash

 

 

________________________________

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Dovid B.
Asterisk Users
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 6:03 AM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] "Decent" sub-$100 SIP phone.

 

Ken,

I would tell the client that you offerd phones for under $100.00 and he
didnt like them so now for a diffrent phone he will have to pay more.
Also I have an 841 and for it works great. I also installed one for a
customer in a mechanic shop and no complaints.

 

Regards,

Dovid

Message: 15
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:28:28 -0500
From: Ken D'Ambrosio <ken at jots.org <mailto:ken at jots.org> >
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] "Decent" sub-$100 SIP phone.
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
<mailto:asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> >
Message-ID: <43C2C76C.8070803 at jots.org
<mailto:43C2C76C.8070803 at jots.org> >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hey, all.  I quoted a customer about $100 for some cheap SIP phones.  I
was planning on using the BT-102's, but he called said they look like
"Princess phones," and I have to admit that he has a point.  Some of the
other inexpensive phones look decent, but (for example) the SPA-841's
wiki entry says the remote end gets a lot of static.  Since it'll be
being used from a noisy environment (a cleanroom), the less overall
static, the better.  Someone suggested the Polycom 301's, but I'd lose
money on them.  [I'll go with them if I have to, as I'm making money
elswhere, but still...]  So, does anyone have any suggestions for decent
sub-$100, professional-looking SIP phones?

Thanks!

Ken D'Ambrosio

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060110/4dd51ec4/attachment.htm