[Asterisk-Users] nat=yes and qualify=yes viable NAT solutions?

[Damon Estep]

Thanks, the linksys is a sipura, so what works on one should work on the
other.

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of C F
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 7:04 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] nat=yes and qualify=yes viable NAT
solutions?

Sipura works, I never tried linksys, Polycom might and might not work.

On 2/26/06, Damon Estep <damon at suburbanbroadband.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> Looking for some feedback on whether nat=yes and qualify=yes will
provide a
> workable solution in many cases?
>
>
>
> The * server is on a public address, no NAT, the UAs (sipura, linksys,
> polycom) are behind various types of NAT.
>
>
>
> Obviously port mapping in the NAT device works, but what about cases
where
> there is no admin access possible to the NAT device?
>
>
>
> From what I have read nat=yes makes asterisk look at the udp header
instead
> of the SIP info for the UA IP address, and qualify=yes sends
keepalives in
> the form of frequent SIP OPTIONS queries. I think I also read that
nat=yes
> enables symmetrical RTP
>
>
>
> What I do not know is does it work in the real world?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users