[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning

Adam Robins arobins at PharmaCentra.com
Mon Feb 20 16:50:32 MST 2006


Thanks, but we already have the TOS bits set to 0xB8, which matches the QoS settings in our switches and routers.
 
This is definitely something that changed in the 1.07 to 1.24 upgrade.  We have a pair of identical 1.07 servers connected via the same network pipe that do not exhibit these issues.
 
I might try recompiling with the old jitterbuffer to see if it makes a difference.
 

 
________________________________

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com on behalf of Jesus E Zepeda
Sent: Mon 2/20/2006 5:02 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning



In my case I don't have a T1 or even a fractional T1, but cable and have
noticed that choppy calls can be reduced by adding tos settings. Like:

Tos=lowdelay|throughput|reliability

Regards,
Jesus

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Robins [mailto:arobins at PharmaCentra.com]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 14:43
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer
Tuning


I have now set the "resyncthreshold" to -1, to turn it off.  I have also
set the "maxjitterbuffer" to 2000.

I still received 10 complaints of choppy calls today on Asterisk 1.2.4
versus only 1 complaint on Asterisk 1.07.



-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of yusuf
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 10:27 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer
Tuning

Adam Robins wrote:
>
Hi Adam

> After many days of playing with the new jitterbuffer and trunking
options for IAX2, I have finally received almost acceptable quality.  I
am receiving 5-8 complaints a day of calls "breaking up" from both the
customer and agent sides.  What I have discovered is that in most of
these cases, the new jitterbuffer performed a resync during the call.
Currently, I have the resyncthreshold, and all other jb parameters at
their default levels  The traffic is running over a fairly high latency
WAN connection between Canada and Atlanta (IAX2, ILBC).  Idle ping times
run about 85ms.
>
I am interested to know why you are using ilbc, n why not g729 ot g723
or speex.  What is the size of the WAN connection.  How many calls are
you running over this link.  I just need to see how others are fairing
with IAX2 over WAN links, as I am the final stages of testing on my side


thanks,
yusuf
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

The contents of this email message and any attachments are confidential
and are intended solely for addressee. The information may also be
legally privileged. This transmission is sent in trust, for the sole
purpose of delivery to the intended recipient. If you have received this
transmission in error, any use, reproduction or dissemination of this
transmission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply email and
delete this message and its attachments, if any.


_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060220/17654689/attachment.htm


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list