[Asterisk-Users] Aasterisk large-scale deployment w/analog phones

[Joshua McAdam]

Sorry people, don't know what happened here.... my bad


-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Joshua McAdam
Sent: Friday, 17 February 2006 1:42 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Aasterisk large-scale deployment w/analog
phones

interesting

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Matt Florell
Sent: Friday, 17 February 2006 1:18 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Aasterisk large-scale deployment w/analog
phones

Hello,

We had over 100 ATA adapters in production 3 years ago. Now we have
less than 20. They use more power overall than Channelbanks, they are
not designed to be used 12-16 hours a day every day. You must
configure and test every one. They do not last as long as
channelbanks.

Using Channelbanks has saved us time and cost in fixing/replacing
equipment, We have not had to replace a single one of the ten
channelbanks we've had in place for the last 18 months. In the first
year of ATA usage, we had to replace 20% of our ATAs(overheating,
random dying, coffee, soda, other abuse).

As for initial purchase cost, ATA adapters are actually slightly
cheaper per port than channelbanks(if buying new).

MATT---


On 2/15/06, Dovid Bender <asteriskdigium at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I may be missing something here but why wouldnt ATA's
> work ? (other than cost).
> --- maka <icokan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > hello,
> >
> > I am planning a fairly large hotel VoIP system,
> > using analog phones. It will
> > consist of about 100 analog phones, that must have
> > access to a VoIP server.
> > I am considering an option to use a couple of
> > asterisk boxes, bundled with a
> > total of four TDM2460E cards, and one TDM2451E card.
> >
> > Has anyone on this list done something similar? It
> > would be great to hear
> > some comments regarding a smilar setuyp/planning -
> > Do you think is it better
> > to distribute resources among multiple (more than
> > two), lower-port-density
> > asterisk servers? Or is it better to use a
> > channelbank for that purpose?
> >
> > Cheers
> > > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com
> > --
> >
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >
> >
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users