[Asterisk-Users] attended call transfer

Lenz lenz-ml at loway.it
Mon Feb 13 09:21:41 MST 2006


I believe many users would benefit from such an improvement. That's the  
kind of annoyance that is usually not present in a decent PBX and that  
people have the worst time getting used to (at least in my experience).
l.

On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:46:35 +0100, Alex Barnes  
<abarnes at ubiquitysoftware.com> wrote:

>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
>> bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Michael Collins
>> Sent: 13 February 2006 00:58
>> To: jnovack at stromberg-carlson.org; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-
>> Commercial Discussion
>> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] attended call transfer
>>
>> Questions for the community: is an "integrated" transfer feature
>> valuable to you?  If so, would you be willing to put out a bounty?
> (In
>> other words, is it just a nice feature or is it so important that
> you'd
>> be willing to pay a few bucks for it...)  Last question, but possibly
>> the most important: what have you done, if anything, to get around the
>> split between blind and attended transfers?
>>
>> -MC
>>
>
> To get around this issue we have had to only use attended transfer with
> Snom phones which are easy to train our users on.
>
> People with DECT / ??? phones have been told to only ever use blind
> (only about 10 out of 50 extensions so not the end of the world).
>
>
> We would definitely chip in some money for this to happen but again it
> would have be in the stable release soon as we cant deploy anything
> except stable.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Alex
>
-- 
Loway Research - Home of QueueMetrics
http://queuemetrics.loway.it




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list