[Asterisk-Users] more cpu intensive echo cancellers ?

[Gerard Saraber]

On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 16:05 -0600, Matthew Fredrickson wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2006, at 1:21 PM, Gerard Saraber wrote:
> >
> > Found it, going to go test it right now :) thanks!
> > So far reports have been positive on the echo, but its a slow day ;)
> > We're using cisco 7960 phones, they're pricy, but they work great and
> > sound good, if it wasn't for the echo issue, I would have been able to
> > roll the whole setup out already.
> > Actually that's not quite true, I still have to make the 7914 addon
> > module work with the 7960 phone, but that's not a show stopper.
> >
> > Either way, so far big thumbs up for the MG2 echo can, and if any
> > developers read this, feel free to add a compile flag to make it more
> > cpu intensive ;) and do more canceling.
> >
> 
> Does latest MG2 behave better than KB1 on your analog lines?  I heard 
> in the past that in some cases (primarily with analog lines) that KB1 
> worked better.  Also, have you tried the echotraining=800  (in 
> zapata.conf) tweak as well?
> 
> ---
> Matthew Fredrickson

In my case, MG2 blows KB1 away, the trunk version is a huge improvement,
in the past, echotraining=<some number> was always worse compared to
echotraining=yes so I didn't change it. I'll definately try that if I
get any echo complaints, so far, so good though.

-- 
Regards,
Gerard Saraber
Network Admin, Rarcoa, Inc.
(630) 654-2580 x11
gsaraber at rarcoa.com