[Asterisk-Users] 5,000 concurrent calls system rollout question
Paul Mahler
paul.mahler at signate.com
Wed Feb 1 06:46:44 MST 2006
Based on our benchmarking, I am VERY skeptical of this number. I'm guessing
that you don't really have RTP streams going through the NIC.
_____
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Joash Herbrink
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 12:23 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] 5,000 concurrent calls system rollout question
I have tested an asterisk server with over 5000 concurrent calls.
The system setup was a P4 HT 3Ghz, 4 Gb RAM, and 1 gbps Ethernet connection
on a cisco 3560 switch.
This works, but puts some serious stresses on the system.
Why don't u considered using g.729 codec, this will at least lower the
bandwidth consumption significantly, and, you can overcome the CPU resource
issue by just using a server grade multi CPU xeon server.
I would never the less still connect the system via 2 ethernet connections,
just for some redundancy, as mentioned before in this thread.
Bandwidth should be about 24 kbps (half duplex) per call
So, 5000 * 24 is roughly 120 mbps, so a gigabit Ethernet should do just
fine.
Joash
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Dustin Wildes
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 8:54 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 5,000 concurrent calls system rollout question
Dinesh Nair wrote:
>
>
> On 02/01/06 09:29 Damon Estep said the following:
>
>> Ok, now lets go for 5000 of them. 160kbps*5000=800000kbps or 800mbps -
>> full duplex.
>>
>> Have you ever seen a NIC or switch that can run GigE full duplex at 80%
>> utilization and not at least start to fall apart?
>
>
> additionally, 5000 simultaneous SIP calls at 20ms intervals will send,
>
> 5,000 * 50 * 2 = 500,000 packets per second (full duplex).
>
> not too many boxes can handle such packet load, in spite of the
> relatively small packet sizes.
>
Why not bond multiple NICs together to do a load balance output? Would
provide redundancy as well.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060201/0b57576f/attachment.htm
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list