[asterisk-users] Limitations of IAX

Douglas Garstang dgarstang at oneeighty.com
Wed Aug 2 11:28:24 MST 2006


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:akohlsmith-asterisk at benshaw.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 11:54 AM
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Limitations of IAX
> 
> 
> On Wednesday 02 August 2006 09:42, Joshua Colp wrote:
> > As previously pointed out transporting the account code may 
> be a security
> > risk as well. If you really need it why don't you encode it 
> into the dialed
> > number or something?
> 
> Because that's a completely shitty workaround for something 
> that "may" be a 
> security risk.  DISA "may" be a security risk too but it's 
> there in all its 
> glory; why not allow people to shoot themselves in the foot?  
> Why not have a 
> "restrictvars=yes" in iax.conf?  If I create a patch to do 
> this against svn 
> trunk, would such a thing be accepted?
> 
> Mr. Garstang is very grating at times but he has brought 
> forward a number of 
> shortcomings which if fixed would make the use of Asterisk far more 
> intuitive.  And as I am certain you have seen on this very 
> list, some of the 
> workarounds people have done in order to make things work are 
> hideous, 
> hideous abominations.

Thankyou, Mr Kolhsmith (I think...?)

A large part of my frustration with Asterisk is that, without intentionally sounding conceited, we are pushing the evelope on what it can do. Most Asterisk users are implementing it in an enterprise environment. We are 'trying' to implement it in a carrier environment, ie providing a hosted IPT service to enterprises, which means that the features and functionality required make my head spin sometimes, and push Asterisk beyond what it was designed to do.

Doug.



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list