[Asterisk-Users] PANASONIC KX-TS208W - Speakerphone Incompatible With Asterisk 1.2.3

[John Novack]

The book states "batteries not supplied" so perhaps they were never 
installed?

And what FXS circuit are you using to interface to Asterisk?
The difference in loop current between VeriZon and the local interface 
could be an answer

John Novack


broadbandvoice at comcast.net wrote:

> Thanks for the response, I'll ask the client to change batteries, 
> though it is a new phone less than two weeks. is there any reason why 
> the Lanline(Verizon) work and not the Asterisk? The only differences 
> is the Asterisk, Linksys router and the DSL modem. One of these 3 
> should be interfering.
>  
>
>     -------------- Original message --------------
>     From: John Novack <jnovack at stromberg-carlson.org>
>
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > broadbandvoice at comcast.net wrote:
>     >
>     > > I'm using Asterisk 1.2.3 and PANASONIC KX-TS208W -
>     Speakerphone does
>     > > not work with it. It works fine when you pick up the handset.
>     Anyone
>     > > experinced this problem before, the speaker works fine with
>     Verizon
>     > > line. The phone is behind a Linsys router RT31P2.
>     > > Replace the batteries! Alkaline only, replace every 6 months
>     > > 1.2.3 is also defective for other reasons. Upgrade
>     > > Using a TDM400, an ATA or ??
>     > > The phone works best with a 48V 20mA or better loop, so the
>     FXS source
>     > > voltage may have an effect, and this cheap phone has no
>     previsions
>     > > for external power.
>     > >
>     > > John Novack
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>     >
>     > Asterisk-Users mailing list
>     > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>     > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060422/2bab0d89/attachment.htm