[Asterisk-Users] Re: SLIN format

[Watkins, Bradley]

The OP was referring to how sox interprets filename extensions.  In that
case, Kevin's .raw and .sw extensions are correct.

- Brad

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
tony at softins.clara.co.uk
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 12:56 PM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: SLIN format


In article <444662AC.9080907 at digium.com>,
Kevin P. Fleming <kpfleming at digium.com> wrote:
> Steve Kennedy wrote:
> > In sox terms is SLIN .ul (as in unsigned linear).
> 
> No. ul is ulaw. SLINEAR is .raw, or .sw (signed word).

According to format_sln.c, it is .raw or .sln

But IMO standard .wav format with mono, 16-bit, 8000Hz is more useful, since
it contains the same audio data as .raw or .sln, but with the addition of a
44-byte header that allows you easily to play it with standard utilities on
either Windows or Linux.

Cheers
Tony
-- 
Tony Mountifield
Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It
contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named
addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose
it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately
and then destroy it.