[Asterisk-Users] Pickup() h323

[Pavel Jezek]

I have exactly oposite experience:
I'm using in two sites one with callmanager (v4), one with gnugk 
gatekeeper and ci$co h323 gateways
with ooh323 - caller id name is not go through, when calling from 
asterisk to callmanager, sending dtmf from callmanger to asterisk isn't 
funtional
with oh323 - caller id isn't working, dtmf OK, but problems with oh323 
registering to two gatekeepers, also seems, that oh323 isn't good 
maintained, look at bugtracker and last release date :-(
original h.323 is working prety good for me on site with callmanager and 
on site with dual gatekeepers (except pickup via this channel, as I 
wrote at beginning, but maybe this be implemented soon ;-)
PJ





Dan Austin wrote:
>
> Better is subjective in this case.  There's no doubt that chan_ooh323
> has some warts.  On the other hand it has NO external library
> requirements,
> and works out of the box with Cisco's Call Manager.
>
> One could argue that Call Manager is crap.  Fine, that doesn't change
> the fact some of us are stuck with it.
>
> Chan_h323 did not work with CCM, and a query/bug report was dismissed,
> basically stating that Cisco was F'd up and the channel would not be
> updated to work with it unless funded. (fair, but not helpful)
>
> Chan_oh323 worked with CCM, but suffered from the external library
> requirements.
>
> Chan_ooh323 just worked.  The code is, to a infrequent programmer,
> easy to read, extend and fix bugs.
>
> So for me chan_ooh323 is a 'better' H.323 channel driver.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>