[Asterisk-Users] why even use SIP

Michael Graves mgraves at mstvp.com
Fri Mar 25 15:00:06 MST 2005


I'd look at the Polycom IP300 or IP500. They do an awfull lot for under
$200 each. Moreover, you'd have multi-line capability, transfers,
conferencing on-phone, etc. They are provisioned centrally from an ftp
server and easily configured. You can can also power them over
ethernet, which would eliminate the gaggle of wall-warts that the
Sipura's need. 

You might also consider the Sipura IP phone, although I have no
experience with it. It's supposed to be a two line phone.

I just think that an all-digital solution is way more promising in the
long run. Worth the effort, even if the initial cost is slightly more.

Michael

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:28:20 -0800, Sys Admin wrote:

>exactly u bring me to one more anamoly in this industry:
>(the first one was IAX being beter then SIP but not yet ready for prime time)
>
>with a sipura 2001 FXS port the company I am consulting with can plug
>in very high end quality analog phones each say for $50 offering
>speaker phone / cordless phone / answering machine integrated with the
>phone which they can hear before they decide to pick up or not etc
>etc... So each workstation ends up costing say $90 ($50 for the phone
>and $40 for the one FXS port on a sipura 2001)
>
>Now this same feature set if I was to look for in a IP phone, the cost
>would be more then $300,
>
>whats up with that ?
>
>t
>
>On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:21:16 -0600, Michael Graves <mgraves at mstvp.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:14:12 -0800, Sys Admin wrote:
>> 
>> >each of the desks already has two rj45 network ports so it makes sense
>> >for me to put a sipura 2001 at each of the deks rather then getting a
>> >channel bank and then having to do new cabling,
>> >
>> >will i be ok with ordering 25 of the sipura 2001 since each one of
>> >them have 2 FXS ports. Or  are there firmware/voice quality/asterisk
>> >integration issues to use both FXS ports on a sipura 2001
>> >simultaneously.
>> >
>> >t
>> >
>> >
>> >On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 14:52:48 -0600, Michael Graves <mgraves at mstvp.com> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:46:41 -0800, Sys Admin wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >after two days of experiments finally decided to go with sipura 2001.
>> >> >
>> >> >I was wondering to support a 50 people call center do i need 25 sipura
>> >> >2001 or 50 of these ?
>> >> >
>> >> >t
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> For such a large installation you'd be far better of with a channel
>> >> bank to provide FXS ports. Much less network cabling and hassle. You'd
>> >> use a t-1 connection to bridge between * and the channel bank. The wiki
>> >> has lots of detail on this stuff.
>> >>
>> 
>> If you already have all that Cat5 then why not consider low end IP
>> phones?
>> 
>> I shudder to think about having to configure and support all those
>> SPAs. All those wall-wart PSUs.
>> 
>> Seems less than elegant.
>> 
>> Michael
>> 
>> --
>> Michael Graves                           mgraves at pixelpower.com
>> Sr. Product Specialist                          www.pixelpower.com
>> Pixel Power Inc.                                 mgraves at mstvp.com
>> 
>> o713-861-4005
>> o800-905-6412
>> c713-201-1262
>> 
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>

--
Michael Graves                           mgraves at pixelpower.com
Sr. Product Specialist                          www.pixelpower.com
Pixel Power Inc.                                 mgraves at mstvp.com

o713-861-4005
o800-905-6412
c713-201-1262






More information about the asterisk-users mailing list