[Asterisk-Users] Opinions of Sphinx?

[mattf]

We use batch sphinx to analyze recordings at night. We attempted real-time
sphinx, but it is way too slow and resource-intensive to use for realtime on
Asterisk with more than a couple lines at once(and that's at the poor
quality settings). We have not tried sphinx4, but I wouldn't imagine that it
would be that much improved in speed over version 3.

MATT---


-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Roy [mailto:mister.roy at gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 6:56 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Opinions of Sphinx?


On 5/31/05, Alistair Cunningham <acunningham at integrics.com> wrote:

> 
> Has anyone tried Asterisk and Sphinx (bonus points if in a production
> environment)? If so, what's your opinion on quality of recognition,
> stability, resource usage, etc?

Alistair,

Well, it's been a couple weeks and no answers on the list. That isn't
encouraging, but I'm hoping to accomplish some of the same thing. Have
you made any progress on your own with this? Let me(us) know...

Thanks,

-Brian
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users