[Asterisk-Users] G.729? Worth it?

Jim Van Meggelen jim at vanmeggelen.ca
Wed Jan 19 11:32:04 MST 2005


asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com wrote:
>> Low bandwidth
>> Low CPU utilization
>> Best audio quality
>> 
> 
> I think you might want to clarify that Best audio quality is in
> relation to other highly compressed codecs.  Certainly my (albeit
> limited) experience is that g711 is much more clear than g729.  
> Compared against gsm, for example, however, the audio quality is
> quite good.... 

What I was saying was that you can only have two of the three. It's an
old adage about compromise.

G.711:
Low Nadwidth:		NO
Low CPU utilization:	YES
Best Quality:		YES (as far as telephony codecs go)

G.729
Low Bandwidth:		YES
Low CPU Utilization:	NO
Best Quality:		NO


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.0 - Release Date: 17/01/2005
 




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list