[Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice Patch Error {Scanned}

skamp skamp at arkayinc.com
Tue Jan 18 21:12:45 MST 2005


i use broadvoice with asterisk with no issues.... it works, and i didnt
need the patch

On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 19:46 -0800, David Shaw wrote:
> Thanks Paul, This is over my head for now. I will sign up for broadvoice
> next week and see if it works. I had signed up for Broadvoice last week
> had problems so I drop them. They said I had connected but I couldn't
> receive or place calls with them.
> 
> Thanks, David
> 
> 
> 
> > It seems highly likely that it would be in cvs by now. I would not use
> > the file produced by this patch run without first finding out why hunk
> > #12 succeeded. One possible cause would be that the original hunk has
> > been reversed in cvs for some good reason. Note that I usually use this
> > safe and sane test when working with modified sources from debian or
> > another distro. Sometimes the package maintainers apply some patches to
> > the upstream source but they don't always clearly document that. Anyway,
> > I used this method to patch and build * for debian. It was not the cvs
> > version but it did the job(see if broadvoice will work). I will probably
> > create a debian package set from cvs next but I need to have a 1.03
> > machine running alongside the cvs machine in order to file truly
> > meaningful bug reports :)
> >
> > Dalon Westergreen wrote:
> >
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>http://edvina.net/broadvoice/patch.shtml
> >>
> >>this site claims that the patch was incorporated into the * cvs tree
> >>as of 12/12/2004
> >>
> >>--dalon
> >>
> >>On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:15:01 -0800, David Shaw <asterisk at ke6upi.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I ran a test patch like Paul said.
> >>>
> >>>[root at redhat test]# patch chan_sip.c broadvoicesip2.txt
> >>>patching file chan_sip.c
> >>>Hunk #1 FAILED at 231.
> >>>Hunk #2 FAILED at 323.
> >>>Hunk #3 FAILED at 494.
> >>>Hunk #4 FAILED at 502.
> >>>Hunk #5 FAILED at 3738.
> >>>Hunk #6 FAILED at 4049.
> >>>Hunk #7 FAILED at 4071.
> >>>Hunk #8 FAILED at 4091.
> >>>Hunk #9 FAILED at 4123.
> >>>Hunk #10 FAILED at 4165.
> >>>Hunk #11 FAILED at 4181.
> >>>Hunk #12 succeeded at 4309 (offset 105 lines).
> >>>Hunk #13 FAILED at 4320.
> >>>Hunk #14 FAILED at 4335.
> >>>Hunk #15 FAILED at 4450.
> >>>Hunk #16 FAILED at 6402.
> >>>Hunk #17 FAILED at 6526.
> >>>Hunk #18 FAILED at 6939.
> >>>Hunk #19 FAILED at 6974.
> >>>18 out of 19 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file chan_sip.c.rej
> >>>[root at redhat test]#
> >>>
> >>>I'm guessing I have a patched verison of Asterisk?
> >>>I tested this on a fresh CVS install.
> >>>
> >>>Thanks, David
> >>>
> >>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>From: "Paul" <digium-list at 9ux.com>
> >>>To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> >>><asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> >>>Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 10:31 AM
> >>>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice Patch Error {Scanned}
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>There is a sane and safe way to do this when you are not sure if the
> >>>>patches are already in:
> >>>>
> >>>>1 - create a new "scratch" directory
> >>>>
> >>>>2 - copy the patch and chan_sip.c to that directory
> >>>>
> >>>>3 - patch chan_sip.c broadvoicesip2.txt
> >>>>
> >>>>If you have the right(unpatched) version of the c source you will only
> >>>>get messages about hunks suceeding.
> >>>>
> >>>>ls -al should now yield something like this:
> >>>>
> >>>>drwxr-xr-x   2 sysadmin sysadmin   4096 2005-01-13 00:42 .
> >>>>drwxr-xr-x  16 sysadmin sysadmin   4096 2005-01-17 23:38 ..
> >>>>-rw-r--r--   1 sysadmin sysadmin  15116 2004-12-12 06:02
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>broadvoicesip2.txt
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>-rw-r--r--   1 sysadmin sysadmin 291894 2005-01-13 00:42 chan_sip.c
> >>>>-rw-r--r--   1 sysadmin sysadmin 287963 2004-10-25 13:57
> >>>> chan_sip.c.orig
> >>>>
> >>>>David Shaw wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Hello, I'm trying to patch Asterisk for uses wth BroadVoice. I'm
> >>>>>running Asterisk at Home <mailto:Asterisk at Home>.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Here is the Error:
> >>>>>[root at pbx1 asterisk]# patch < broadvoicesip2.txt
> >>>>>can't find file to patch at input line 8
> >>>>>Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
> >>>>>The text leading up to this was:
> >>>>>--------------------------
> >>>>>|Index: channels/chan_sip.c
> >>>>>|===================================================================
> >>>>>|RCS file: /usr/cvsroot/asterisk/channels/chan_sip.c,v
> >>>>>|retrieving revision 1.510.2.23
> >>>>>|diff -u -r1.510.2.23 chan_sip.c
> >>>>>|--- channels/chan_sip.c        26 Nov 2004 01:54:11 -0000
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>1.510.2.23
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>|+++ channels/chan_sip.c        12 Dec 2004 10:57:45 -0000
> >>>>>--------------------------
> >>>>>File to patch:
> >>>>>[root at pbx1 asterisk]#
> >>>>>
> >>>>>What file should I patch???
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Thanks, David
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--
> >>>>>This message has been scanned for viruses and
> >>>>>dangerous content by *KE6UPI* <http://ke6upi.com/>, and is
> >>>>>believed to be clean.
> >>>>>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers <http://www.transtec.co.uk/> for
> >>>>>their support.
> >>>>>Plase contact Support at KE6UPI <mailto=support at ke6upi.com> if you
> >>>>>have questions about this email.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >>>>>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> >>>>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >>>>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >>>>>  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >>>>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> >>>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >>>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >>>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >>>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>This message has been scanned for viruses and
> >>>>dangerous content by KE6UPI, and is
> >>>>believed to be clean.
> >>>>KE6UPI thanks MailScanner for their support.
> >>>>Please contact support at ke6upi.com if you have
> >>>>questions about this email.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>--
> >>>This message has been scanned for viruses and
> >>>dangerous content by KE6UPI, and is
> >>>believed to be clean.
> >>>KE6UPI thanks MailScanner for their support.
> >>>Please contact support at ke6upi.com if you have
> >>>questions about this email.
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >>>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> >>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> >>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by KE6UPI, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> > KE6UPI thanks MailScanner for their support.
> > Please contact support at ke6upi.com if you have
> > questions about this email.
> >
> 
> 
> Thanks, David
> 
-- 
skamp <skamp at arkayinc.com>





More information about the asterisk-users mailing list