[Asterisk-Users] PRI concentrator

Tenorio, Leandro LTenorio at intelaction.com
Thu Jan 13 16:01:46 MST 2005


	IMHO, In your environment I would recommend to use several
Gateways (Cisco, Quintum, whatever you choose) to concentrate and do the
transcoding, and use * to switch them and do the other stuff you need. A
lot of times where seen in the list people that measure the load on *
servers that cannot do more than 60 channels at a time. And personally a
do trust more on a GW than in * to do PRI.

LTenorio

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael B. Murdock" <mike123 at switchmaxx.com>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] PRI concentrator


> We are looking to solve the same problem for different reasons.. I am
> currently looking into the Lucent (Ascend) MAX TNT to terminate the
PRI's
> and then use VoIP/SIP to connect to the Asterisk platform.
>
> BTW: Who makes your class-3 switch you are having so much trouble
with?
>
> -- Mike
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Matthew Boehm" <mboehm at cytelcom.com>
> To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 2:24 PM
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] PRI concentrator
>
>
> > Hey gang,
> >  We currently have a class 3 switch (CSX) that..well..it sucks. It
does
> > terrible CDR writes, doesn't support LCR, the list goes on and on.
We
want
> > to replace this with several asterisk boxes each running one or two
4
port
> > PRI cards.
> >  The problem is: I can plug in 20 PRI lines into the CSX (from PSTN)
and
> > have 1 come from CSX into asterisk. If 1 call comes in on each of
the 20
> > pris, the CSX concentrates them into 1 pri into asterisk. Thus I
only
need
> a
> > single PRI card for asterisk box.
> >
> >  If I want to completly replace the CSX, I would need several boxes
with
1
> > or 2 4 port cards. But that is a big waste of money when I can
concentrate
> > into less cables.
> >
> >  Does anyone know of some piece of hardware (other than a carrier
switch)
> > that will do the same thing? Keeping our current switch doesn't cost
> > anything except in terms of power consumption and physical space
(its
like
> > 5U or 8U).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matthew
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list