[Asterisk-Users] ATA that actually work with T.38

Brian M. Arlinghaus asterisk at brianarlinghaus.com
Thu Feb 24 13:05:01 MST 2005


So... If Asterisk did support T.38, would that solve the world's fax 
problems?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matthew Boehm" <mboehm at cytelcom.com>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" 
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ATA that actually work with T.38


> Asterisk must have T38 support in order to recognize the signaling.
> No it doesn't at this time.
>
> -Matthew
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Brian M. Arlinghaus" <asterisk at brianarlinghaus.com>
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 1:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ATA that actually work with T.38
>
>
>> Is it only the ATA that has to be T.38 compatible or does Asterisk have 
>> to
>> work with T.38 also?  Does Asterisk support T.38?
>>
>> Brian
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: James H. Thompson
>> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 4:32 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ATA that actually work with T.38
>>
>>
>> Sipura 2100 is supposed to implement T.38 real-soon-now.
>>
>> I've got a Multi-tech ATA with T.38 support on order on the theory that
>> Multitech has been making well regarded FAX modems for years and might
> know
>> how to actually do FAX reasonably well.
>>
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> James H. Thompson
>> jht at lj.net
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: Steve Underwood
>> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 5:24 AM
>> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ATA that actually work with T.38
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am implementing T.38, and finding a problem getting boxes that work
>> with T.38 for testing. A lot (maybe most) ATAs now claim to support
>> T.38, but I'm finding a lot of these lie. I have one box here that just
>> crashes when it hears a fax tone. :-)
>>
>> I'm looking for boxes known to implement T.38 properly, and which really
>> work in the real world.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Steve
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
>> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
>> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
>> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list