[Asterisk-Users] ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1 - WAS WORKING!!

[Scott Brown]

Hi Rich:

Does the new distro tree issue explain the unresolved symbol references  
noted in my last post?  I don't know if SuSE's 9.3 network autoupdate  
would have changed the tree structure.  The unresolved symbols are  (from  
dmesg):

zt_receive
zt_qevent_lock
zt_ec_chunk
zt_transmit
zt_unregister
zt_hooksig
zt_register

With: "wcfxs: disagrees about version of symbol..."

Scott

On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 06:11:53 -0600, Rich Adamson <radamson at routers.com>  
wrote:

> Seems the latest distro's have changed the layout of the linux source  
> tree
> needed to compile the zaptel stuff. I'm using FC3, upgraded the kernel,  
> and
> have the same issue. Was able to install new sources, but they too are
> completely different tree layout compared to earlier stuff. The same is
> apparently happening with other distro's as well.
>
> There has been a bug item open for last several weeks relative to  
> reworking
> the make files for these items.
>
> ------------------------
>>
>> That suggestion is possibly on the right track.  It made me remember  
>> that -
>> although I'm not using Fedora, but SuSE 9.3, that it went through an
>> automatic network update just recently.  After that, I tried updating  
>> the
>> Zaptel files from CVS and recompiling everything, but to no avail.  The
>> same error still occured.  I eliminated hardware by swapping out a  
>> working
>> TDM400 with the same FXS/FXO configuration.  The same error occurs.  The
>> SuSE update may have moved some of the required files, although there  
>> are
>> no complaints during the build and I can't determine what may have  
>> moved.
>>
>> I have still present and installed Bison 1.875, OpenSSL and zlib-devel,  
>> and
>> of course Linux source for this SuSE disto.  I'm completely faklempt!   
>> Can
>> someone shed light on this delima??   Thanks so much if you can.  I  
>> want my
>> As-terisk back!!!  It was working, damnit.   Thanks, Matt for your  
>> suggestion.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> At 09:30 PM 8/19/2005, you wrote:
>> >sbrown at andersonis.com wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi:
>> > > I hope that someone can help with this problem that came up  
>> suddenly. I
>> >
>> >Did you upgrade Fedora Core?
>> >
>> >Check if the udev files still contain the required entries (normally  
>> fedora
>> >copies the old ones to 50-udev-rules.old and makes new ones).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>



-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/