[Asterisk-Users] stable OS

Greg Boehnlein damin at nacs.net
Mon Sep 27 13:26:49 MST 2004


On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Joshua M. Thompson wrote:

> On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 14:25 -0500, Steven Critchfield wrote:
> 
> > I may be wrong, but the push for fedora any version is for the desktop
> > user. A desktop user is willing to put up with the occasional reboot. An
> > occasional hiccup is less than they currently experience with Windows.
> > With that in mind it can shoot for more bleeding edge code and doesn't
> > have to follow the stringent quality guidlines that is essential for any
> > other mission critical application.
> 
> I've found that if you simply use your own kernel RPMs then FC1 and FC2
> are just fine. I forked off my own 2.6.x kernel RPM back when FC2 was
> still in testing and have been using that on FC1 and FC2 production
> servers ever since.

Josh,
	Pursuant to our discussion at Astricon, can we set some time to 
collaborate on updating the RPMS for FC1 and FC2 so that they are 
consistent accross platforms, take advantage of the latest updates and 
changes?

P.S. Dude.. you stole my beer and I want it back! :)

-- 
    Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
         http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
                             KP-216-121-ST






More information about the asterisk-users mailing list