[Asterisk-Users] confusing info from Digium andasteriskdoc aboutsetup of TDM11B

[Steve Totaro]

Just put a note that channels may vary do to placement of modules.  I think 
that would be more correct.

Also, try a different phone.  I had this problem with a cheap cordless once. 
Give us output from the console.

Give me SSH and I will have it working quickly.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Prior" <sprior at geekster.com>
To: "Leif Madsen" <leif.madsen at gmail.com>; "Asterisk Users Mailing List - 
Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 12:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] confusing info from Digium andasteriskdoc 
aboutsetup of TDM11B


> Looks like it's still incorrect in the first blue paragraph of the section 
> on FXO (it's fixed in the second blue paragraph).  Also, the last 
> paragraph of that section twice still calls the channel # 2.
>
> Now on to my next confusion...  The section on contexts under dislplans 
> mentions
> a context named [incoming].  This isn't a context that's mentioned 
> anywhere before this and it's not at all clear where it comes from - I'm 
> starting to suspect that some context references belong in the 
> zapatel.conf file.
>
> A comment about where the document leaves off.  In the beginning the 
> document
> promises to get to a minimal working set, but it really doesn't go that 
> far.
> Unless I've missed something, we aren't left with even a complete version 
> of the
> minimal example extensions.conf file.  Something is missing so that I'm 
> not getting a dial tone on the analog phone hooked up to the TDM11B and I 
> have no idea why (can anyone clue me in?)  I also tried the:
>
> [incoming]
> exten => s,1,Answer()
> exten => s,2,Playback(goodbye)
> exten => s,3,Hangup()
>
> example and asterisk didn't appear to see the incoming call and answer the 
> call at all.  I'd love for the example files to be complete enough that 
> this example could actually work from either the external POTS line or 
> even better an analog phone hooked to the FXS interface.
>
> I think it would be great if attached to the document there was a "final" 
> version of all of the config files which are known to work with the given 
> configuration.
>
> Can you help get me to a dialtone on the internal side or an answer on the 
> external side?
>
> Thanks
> Steve
>
>
> Leif Madsen wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 12:18:20 -0400, Steve Totaro
>> <asterisk at totarotechnologies.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Yes, it should be four unless you care to move the actual module on the 
>>>card
>>>to the second slot.
>>
>>
>> I have fixed this in CVS now.  Should be propogated to the website in
>> a few minutes.
>>
>> While we do try and test everything, sometimes things get missed. This is 
>> why getting people to test the configurations in Volume-One
>> and report back what does and does not work is important.
>>
>> Thanks for pointing one out!
>> Leif Madsen.
>> http://www.asteriskdocs.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
>> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>