[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk/linux 2.6.9 kernel build failure

[Steven P. Donegan]

Peter Svensson wrote:

>On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Brian West wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I don't agree with this patch yet... It's the distro's fault for doing this
>>wrong and I don't feel we have to work around it.  The few people I talked
>>to have Symlinks the "build" to /usr/src/linux or the like.  Then again I
>>may be wrong anyone know what is the right(tm) thing to do here is?
>>    
>>
>
>Havn't 2.6 adopted the /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/ convention or 
>something similar? 
>
>Not having any 2.6-based machines online at the moment I can not check. 
>This is from memory compiling out-of-tree modules a while back.
>
>Peter
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>  
>
Well - if 2.6.etc did adopt this it isn't reflected in actual make/make 
install world - i.e. nothing gets installed in /lib/modules/anywhere... 
And this is with kernel source from kernel.org - not a distro-tweaked 
source tree