[Asterisk-Users] STUN and Asterisk? (Was: SER is a better
NATsolution?)
Matthew Boehm
mboehm at cytelcom.com
Tue Nov 23 10:28:50 MST 2004
I tried to setup MySTUN (http://developer.berlios.de/projects/mystun/)
and it said STUN servers require 2 seperate public IPs on the same machine.
(and yes, I realize I made a mistake when I said 2 NIC cards)
-Matthew
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gilad Ben-Yossef" <gilad at codefidence.com>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] STUN and Asterisk? (Was: SER is a better
NATsolution?)
> Matthew Boehm wrote:
> > STUN requires 2 NIC interfaces on the machine running the server right?
> > And both interfaces need seperate public IP's right? '
>
> Why ever for?
>
> I realize that in order to set up a STUN server you need a public IP,
> but why two of them and why two different interfaces?
>
>
> Dazed and confused,
> Gilad
>
> --
> Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad at codefidence.com>
> Codefidence. A name you can trust(tm)
> Web: http://codefidence.com | SIP: gilad at pbx.codefidence.com
> Tel: +972.9.8650475 ext. 201 | Fax: +972.9.8850643
>
> "I am Jack's Overwritten Stack Pointer"
> -- Hackers Club, the movie
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list