[Asterisk-Users] Fw: TDMoE over bonded NIC's
Nick Bachmann
asterisk at not-real.org
Mon Nov 22 21:30:35 MST 2004
Kevin Brennan wrote:
>>Kevin Brennan wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I am planning to configure * box A with PSTN interface to route faxes to
>>>
>>>
>>>box B (running spandsp) over TDMoE. I am using 2xGb bonded NIC's for
>>>connection between servers.
>>>
>>>
>>2GB?!? Remember, each voice channel you trunk across TDMoE is 64Kbps.
>>While overprovisioning is laudable, I don't think box B can handle
>>15,000 circuits.
>>
>>
>>
>
>It happens servers come with twin GB NIC's, bonding is for redundancy not
>capacity.
>
>
You know you shouldn't (can't?) use the same interface for regular IP
networking and TDMoE, right? The TDMoE should have an address-less NIC
to itself and _really_ shouldn't run through a hub (an xover would be
ideal). Bonding seems possible, since the bonding is done at a lower
level than Asterisk knows about and just creates a virtual device.
Because both sides just see one NIC with one MAC, the only problem I
could anticipate would be increased latency, but I doubt it's as
significant as the latency a switch creates.
Nick
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list