[Asterisk-Users] Fw: TDMoE over bonded NIC's

Nick Bachmann asterisk at not-real.org
Mon Nov 22 21:30:35 MST 2004


Kevin Brennan wrote:

>>Kevin Brennan wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I am planning to configure * box A with PSTN interface to route faxes to
>>>      
>>>
>>>box B (running spandsp) over TDMoE. I am using 2xGb bonded NIC's for
>>>connection between servers.
>>>      
>>>
>>2GB?!? Remember, each voice channel you trunk across TDMoE is 64Kbps.
>>While overprovisioning is laudable, I don't think box B can handle
>>15,000 circuits.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>It happens servers come with twin GB NIC's, bonding is for redundancy not
>capacity.
>  
>

You know you shouldn't (can't?) use the same interface for regular IP 
networking and TDMoE, right?  The TDMoE should have an address-less NIC 
to itself and _really_ shouldn't run through a hub (an xover would be 
ideal).  Bonding seems possible, since the bonding is done at a lower 
level than Asterisk knows about and just creates a virtual device.  
Because both sides just see one NIC with one MAC, the only problem I 
could anticipate would be increased latency, but I doubt it's as 
significant as the latency a switch creates.

Nick



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list