[Asterisk-Users] SER is a better NAT solution?

[Matthew Boehm]

*bump*

woops..this isn't a forum...

but anyway, this is a good question. We will soon have somewhere in the 500
SIP users range and if I can have 1 machine (SER) handle all the
registration (hopefully out of a database) that will defiantly reduce the
load on my asterisk servers.

I've also heard that SER can do load balancing between multiple * servers.
Any comments/HOWTOs on that?

Thanks,
Matthew
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kuniyoshi Murata" <kuni at ej-interpreter.net>
To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 6:24 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] SER is a better NAT solution?


> Hi,
>
> I'm now setting up a VoIP conference room using Asterisk.
>
> All the clients are SIP phone (to be exact, Xlite), number of clients that
should be registered are around 50 and concurrent users are maybe 15 clients
at most.
>
> So, basically I think I can handle the situation only with Asterisk.
> I'm wondering however, most of my clients are behind NAT of home router
and using SER together with Asterisk sounds better solution.
>
> Is there significant difference between SER and Asterisk, for handling SIP
phones behind NAT?
>
> -- 
> Kuniyoshi Murata.........................iChat/AIM:macwebcaster
> English-Japanese Interpreter     mailto:kuni at ej-interpreter.net
> Macintosh Webcast Specialist        http://www.macwebcaster.com
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users