[Asterisk-Users] Multiple asterisk process

[Gregory Junker]

I *do* do the same for his posts. Every hundredth one or so, I feel it 
necessary to let the poor guy or gal who was unlucky enough to ask a 
simple question that "Critch" felt the need to answer, that we all were 
not like that. As a result, that person might even ask another question 
someday.

Instead of being an ass about it, Steve could just as easily said:

"You can find the information you seek on Google.". It's only a few more 
words, and far more cordial.

Greg

Matt Riddell wrote:
> Gregory Junker wrote:
> 
>> And Steve provides yet another cordial, extremely helpful reply.
>>
>> Really, friend, does it do *that* much for your ego to step on people 
>> in public? If you can't be friendly, just ignore the damn email, no 
>> matter how many times the question has been asked.
> 
> 
> Maybe you could do the same for his posts.
> 
> 8000 messages for first post (poster should have checked google - BTW 
> its ok)
> 
> 8000 messages for post telling him to search google
> 
> 8000 messages for post telling Steven to ignore the mail
> 
> 8000 messages for this post I am currently sending.
> 
> 1. The first message shouldn't have been sent. (If everybody had ignored 
> him he would have ended up at google anyway)
> 
> 2. The 2nd, 3rd and 4th messages shouldn't have been sent (an extra 
> 24,000 mails sent out) - and yes I know the 4th is my mail.
> 
> 3. Maybe a new rule :-)  Don't flame, but if someone does, don't respond 
> to it.  It will go away if you ignore it.
> 
> Oh yeah, and sorry for polluting the net with this post...hopefully 
> it'll be the last on the subject.
>