[Asterisk-Users] Re: Top posting

[Kavit Munshi]

Jon Radon wrote:

>Worst thread ever.
>
>
>On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:02:07 -0600, Michael Greb <mikegrb at gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:53:52 -0600, Jay Milk <jay at skimmilk.net> wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>So, that's how my tax dollars are spent?  Outrageous, and certainly
>>>news-worthy.  Good luck fighting off CNN and the like when this leaks
>>>out.
>>>      
>>>
>>Not at all, this is one of my favorite policies that has come from the
>>performance improvement department.  Yes that is right, it is official
>>policy at my location to not deal with people who top-post.  PI
>>decided that with people moved around between positions it is always
>>best for bottom-posting just as if on a mailing list even in two party
>>communications as, if another person comes into the discussion, it is
>>much quicker, and thus cheaper, to have a properly formatted
>>communication to come up to speed.  This is the same as the policy
>>that businesses that send ill-formatted bussiness letters will not
>>receive addition business when there is another suplier capable of
>>delivering the product/service.
>>
>>Top-posting is even grounds for being written up if you later need to
>>forward a copy of a message on to another department or person.
>>
>>Michael Greb
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>
what is top posting anyway?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20041116/76cbe24d/attachment.htm