[Asterisk-Users] ISDN Dialplan

[Paulo Adriano]

It*s solved  now. You are right it  was a matter of formating the
outgoing number.   
 
Thanks 
 
Paulo 
 
>>>psvasterisk at psv.nu 11/03 1:34 pm >>> 
 
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Paulo Adriano wrote: 
 
 
>After trying that syntax I still have the same problem, one thing is 
 
>very strange is the number that Asterisk reports as the incoming. My 
 
>ESN*s numbers are 219898334 and 219898335 but on the console I see 
 
>219898334,1 and 219898335,1 
 
 
Are you sure it is not trying to tell you extension 219898334 and
priority 
 
1 in the dialplan? 
 
 
[snip} 
 
 
>THIS IS AN OUTGOING CALL TRY TO NUMBER 213570150       MY DIALPLAN
REQUIRES 9 to go outside 
 
>  
 
>*CLI>     -- Executing Dial(SIP/21-9da8, Modem/g1/9213570150||tr) in
new stack 
 
>Nov  3 18:37:35 WARNING[1110502320]: chan_modem.c:191 modem_call:
Destination g1/9213570150 requres a real destination
(device:destination) 
 
>    -- Couldn't call g1/9213570150 
 
>    -- Hungup 'Modem[i4l]/ttyI1' 
 
>  == Everyone is busy/congested at this time 
 
>Nov  3 18:37:45 WARNING[1110502320]: pbx.c:1933 ast_pbx_run: Timeout,
but no rule 't' in context 'local-access' 
 
>    -- Saved useragent SJLabs-SJphone/1.30.248 for peer 21 
 
 
The source for chan_modem suggests that the dial string should be 
 
formatted like 
 
    Dial(Modem/g1:9213570150||tr) 
 
 
Peter 
 
 
 
 
 
Asterisk-Users mailing list 
 
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com 
 
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 
 
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: 
 
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20041103/d471c6ed/attachment.htm