[Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows

[Karl J. Vesterling]

Agreed;

This conversation does not belong on this list.

My reason and primary concern however is that Asterisk be hijacked by 
demand and deployed on an unreliable system and therefore gain the stigma 
of being "unreliable" since the chain is only as strong as the weakest link.

At 06:41 PM 11/1/2004, you wrote:
>Not to say that all Govt's are like this, but we employ a LOT of open 
>source. It comes down to a money issue. But besides that, we still use 
>Windows, and YES it does have its place. I don't think that this thread 
>belongs on this list.
>
>-Tim
>-----Original Message-----
>From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com 
>[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Karl J. 
>Vesterling
>Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 5:24 PM
>To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows
>
>
>As far as I understand, corporation, and Govt's like commercial products 
>because of the issue of liability.  That is why the Commercial market and 
>Govt market don't accept open source solutions.
>
>What is perplexing about the whole situation is that the licensing 
>agreements with commercial software 99.9% of the time indemnify the vendor 
>of any and all liability.
>
>So, what we have is the "feeling" of security...  Perhaps Linus should 
>convince the various entities that distribute Linux to include a nice 
>fluffy security blanket with the licensing agreement embroidered on 
>it?  That way the attorneys can get that "warm fuzzy feeling" they so desire.
>
>I speak from much experience regarding this matter...
>The U.S. Govt won't accept an open-source solution even if it is the only 
>option to cover their ass.  They'd rather leave their cheese out in the 
>wind than cover it with an open source solution.
>
>Question: Why isn't there a commercial solution available in some cases?
>Answer: What company in their right mind would engineer a competing 
>product to a solution that costs $0.00 ???
>
>
>At 05:59 PM 11/1/2004, you wrote:
>
>Jay Milk wrote:
>
>Why are you so angry?
>
>At the risk of throwing oil on the fire, I would submit that Benjamin was 
>*kidding* at the beginning of that mail, and trolling at the end.
>
>I agree with him about the "quit anytime I want," but I digress. . .
>
>It does appear his flamebait was eagerly pounced upon.  Why would the 
>Window$ user$ mind the nose-tweaking?  They've got 90%+ of the market.
>
>B.
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>Best Regards,
>Karl J. Vesterling
>E-Mail: kjv at ken-ton.com
>Yahoo Messenger: karl_vesterling
>ICQ: 1548052
>AOL Instant Messenger: n2vqm
>
>Telephone:
>Washington DC: (202) 448-3009 Extension 0
>Annapolis MD: (240) 524-6706 Extension 0
>Seattle WA: (360) 516-1822 Extension 0
>Niagara Falls NY: (716) 286-9175 Extension 0
>Buffalo NY: (716) 608-1121 Extension 0
>United Kingdom: 0870 3403428 Extension 0
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Best Regards,
Karl J. Vesterling
E-Mail: kjv at ken-ton.com
Yahoo Messenger: karl_vesterling
ICQ: 1548052
AOL Instant Messenger: n2vqm

----------
Telephone:
Washington DC: (202) 448-3009 Extension 0
Annapolis MD: (240) 524-6706 Extension 0
Seattle WA: (360) 516-1822 Extension 0
Niagara Falls NY: (716) 286-9175 Extension 0
Buffalo NY: (716) 608-1121 Extension 0
United Kingdom: 0870 3403428 Extension 0  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20041101/2e35336b/attachment.htm