[Asterisk-Users] IVR setup (was "Dialogic supported well?")

Scott Stingel scott at evtmedia.com
Tue Mar 9 12:04:22 MST 2004


jason-

Least powerful was 2.2GHz P4, and E400P.

Not really that "weak"!

Cheers
Scott

Scott M. Stingel 
Emerging Voice Technology Inc.

Email:          scott "at " evtmedia.com 
URL:            www.evtmedia.com 

 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com 
>[mailto:asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jason Boyd
>Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 6:05 PM
>To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IVR setup (was "Dialogic 
>supported well?")
>
>On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:44:09 -0000
>"Scott Stingel" <scott at evtmedia.com> wrote:
>
>> I was going to update the page called "Dimensioning an Asterisk
>> System", at the request of Philipp von Klitzing, who set up 
>that page.
>> Maybe at the same time, we could do the page you refer to?
>
>That would be great.  For the record, the pages in question are:
>
>http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+dimensioning
>http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+hardware+recommendations
>
>and they do overlap a little.
>
>> I've used a couple of different setups, and all hit roughly the same
>> maximum call rate.  The fastest setup is 2.4G Xeon's, Fedora 1, and
>> TE410P's. E400P's and TE410P's were about the same in performance in
>> my load testing.
>
>Out of curiosity, what was the least powerful system that yielded the
>same maximum call rate?
>
>Thanks,
>Jason
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list