[1-9] as E? (was: [Asterisk-Users] Busy message)

[Roger Schreiter]

Keith Waters schrieb:
...
> I configured:
> 
> exten => _[123456789]XXXX,1,NoOp(.call for .${EXTEN})

I consider a short key for [1-9] at least
as useful as N for [2-9], maybe even more useful.

For my internal purposes I'm using E for [1-9].

Am I the only one, who is missing something short
for [1-9]?


Roger.