[Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs

[Wojciech Tryc]

Any suggestions on how to resolve this problem? :)
Thanks,
Wojtek


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Aaron J. Angel" <aaron at angel-family.com>
To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 12:01 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs


> Try RFC3761.  It specifies E2U+<spec> under section 2.4.2.  It obsoletes
> RFC2916, and nothing has superseded it yet.
> 
> Brian K. West [brian at bkw.org] wrote:
> > 3762 is for h323 only:
> > 
> > RFC 3762 - Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service
> > Registration for H.323
> > 
> > 2916 is a bit more general:
> > 
> > RFC 2916 - E.164 number and DNS
> > 
> > Then we have:
> > 
> > RFC 2915 - The Naming Authority Pointer (NAPTR) DNS Resource Record
> > 
> > I was pointing out that E2U+IAX2 was backwards..   but then
> > again  asterisk
> > doesn't really care about that... at this point.
> > 
> > bkw
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Duane" <duane at e164.org>
> > To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 9:48 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
> > 
> > 
> >> Brian K. West wrote:
> >> 
> >>> but then again what do I know.. I have only been using
> > enum for about a
> > year
> >>> now.
> >> 
> >> RFC's change, if you want to stick to the standards you have to keep
> >> up with them... 
> >> 
> >> 3762 > 2916
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>