[Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs

[Aaron J. Angel]

Try RFC3761.  It specifies E2U+<spec> under section 2.4.2.  It obsoletes
RFC2916, and nothing has superseded it yet.

Brian K. West [brian at bkw.org] wrote:
> 3762 is for h323 only:
> 
> RFC 3762 - Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service
> Registration for H.323
> 
> 2916 is a bit more general:
> 
> RFC 2916 - E.164 number and DNS
> 
> Then we have:
> 
> RFC 2915 - The Naming Authority Pointer (NAPTR) DNS Resource Record
> 
> I was pointing out that E2U+IAX2 was backwards..   but then
> again  asterisk
> doesn't really care about that... at this point.
> 
> bkw
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Duane" <duane at e164.org>
> To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 9:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
> 
> 
>> Brian K. West wrote:
>> 
>>> but then again what do I know.. I have only been using
> enum for about a
> year
>>> now.
>> 
>> RFC's change, if you want to stick to the standards you have to keep
>> up with them... 
>> 
>> 3762 > 2916