[Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *?

Kevin Walsh kevin at cursor.biz
Sat Jul 31 10:34:37 MST 2004


Wolfgang S. Rupprecht [list+asterisk-users at lists.wsrcc.com] wrote:
> radamson at routers.com (Rich Adamson) writes:
> > Like *, it also has an internal dialplan, however understanding the
> > various interactions requires some experimentation, as each of the
> > interfaces seem to be considered a "gateway", and part of the dialplan
> > directs calls to gw0, gw1, gw2 (etc) which correspond to physical
> > interfaces in most cases.
> >
> I felt some pangs of guilt turning all that stuff off, but I couldn't
> think of any time I'd want two dialplans in series.
> 
It saves having to wait for an inter-digit timeout to expire when
dialling via the FXS port.  The SPA-[123]000 dialplan will recognise
your dial string and send it immediately to Asterisk (if so configured).
Asterisk will take it from there.

You can apparently use the SPA-3000 dialplan to specify that the
call should go via its FXO port, without going via Asterisk.  This
could be useful for emergency services.  I don't have a SPA-3000 yet,
so I can't say what happens if you try to route an emergency call via
the FXO port and that port is in use.  Perhaps it sends the call to
Asterisk instead.  I'll find out when I get mine and play with it.

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/   K e v i n   W a l s h
 _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/    kevin at cursor.biz
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list