[Asterisk-Users] Randy Bush is a destructive force with a hidden professional agenda

[Adam Hart]

Bradley D. Thornton wrote:
>>><snip>
>>>i don't need nats, nat traversal, nat anything.  if i did, iax
>>>might well be one of the technologies i would consider.  but i
>>>don't.
> 
> 
> <snip>
> 
>   Watch out for this man Bush! He is a professional espionage troll
>   and hides his agent status behind his condescending facade.
> 
>   What do you want Randy? Go back to Admiralty way with all your
>   ICANNite cronies if you're not going to behave here!
> 

I have no idea who Randy Bush is but I found it funny the first article 
I found on him was a presentation on why NAT is evil espically for 
voice. Now he asserts that NAT traversal is not needed.

http://www.apnic.net/meetings/17/docs/sigs/policy/addrpol-pres-randy-nats.pdf

Can anyone give me a quick rundown on why there's such discontent for 
this person

-Adam