AW: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?
Michael Graves
gravesmj at earthlink.net
Sat Jan 3 22:09:32 MST 2004
Please forgive me if this is a silly question. I've been following this
thread in the hope that I could put my * server and snom 200 into
full-time service very soon. I need to find out how to have the lines
configured so that it does not return a busy reply when only one call
instances is engaged.
Am I supposed to create multiple extensions on my asterisk dialplan to
reflect the 5 call instances? That is, would the snom 200 be extension
2000 or 2000-2004?
Also, did the 2.03f firmware resolve the matter?
Thanks,
Michael
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 16:05:39 +0100, Christian Stredicke wrote:
>Hi Olle!
>
>I put something into trouble ticket (I guess you get this as email).
>
>BTW 2.03f is available at http://snom.com/download/share.
>
>Christian
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
>> admin at lists.digium.com] Im Auftrag von Olle E. Johansson
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Januar 2004 11:57
>> An: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
>> Betreff: Re: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?
>>
>> Christian Stredicke wrote:
>> > We at snom have problems with Asterisk when we receive calls without the
>> > line indication. When we register we place a contact like this:
>> >
>> > REGISTER sip:asterisk SIP/2.0
>> > Contact: <sip:123 at 192.168.0.99;line=h35h345>
>> >
>> > When we receive the 200 Ok, we search for the "h35h345". If we dont
>> find
>> > it, we try to guess which line is affected. This is relatively easy on a
>> > REGISTER response, but on an incoming INVITE we have serious problems. I
>> > think some of the challenging and line-assignment problems are related
>> to
>> > this problem.
>> >
>> > Strictly speaking, we register the contact
>> > "sip:123 at 192.168.0.99;line=h35h345", NOT "sip:123 at 192.168.0.99"!
>> Parameters
>> > are an essential part of a URI which must not be discarded.
>> Ok, Christian, let's fix this.
>>
>> First, I'm curious, is the "line=" parameter specified somewhere? (Always
>> looking
>> for documentation :-)
>>
>> Secondly, in many places in the sip channel, everything after the ";" is
>> discarded.
>> I would really appreciate if Snom could help us fixing this, so Snom
>> phones work correctly
>> and fully with Asterisk. (Have a new Snom 200 on my desk :-)
>>
>> I'm not an experienced C programmer, so I can't fix this myself. However,
>> there are
>> experienced C programmers in the community that will fix this, but they
>> need proper
>> and detailed input on what to fix.
>>
>> I've opened a bug
>> http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000732
>>
>> Let's continue adding information there.
>>
>> BTW, there's some other Snom problems where we need input from SNOM.
>> Search on "Snom"
>> in the bug tracker. Thank you for participating in the Asterisk community!
>>
>> /O
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
>> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
Michael Graves mgraves at pixelpower.com
Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com
Pixel Power Inc. gravesmj at earthlink.net
FWD 54245
"I am easily satisfied with the very best" - Winston Churchill
"The questions arisen, is this a prison? Some say it is, but I say it
isn't."
- Ian Hunter
** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704
===================END FORWARDED MESSAGE===================
--
Michael Graves mgraves at pixelpower.com
Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com
Pixel Power Inc. gravesmj at earthlink.net
FWD 54245
"I know nothing, but I keep listening." - INXS
** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list