[Asterisk-Users] PLC (Packet loss cancel) questions

matt.riddell at sineapps.com matt.riddell at sineapps.com
Sun Aug 29 10:01:59 MST 2004


On 30 Aug 2004 at 0:26, Steve Underwood wrote:

> matt.riddell at sineapps.com wrote:
> 
> >Why doesn't asterisk clock to the 1000 interrupts per second instead
> >of the incoming audio?  Were there no interrupts available when it
> >started?  Even if you had no card you could use the ztdummy module
> >and even though that might be off by a bit, surely it'd sound better
> >than a connection which is experiencing packet loss?
> >
> >How much work would be required to change this?  I guess it couldn't
> >really be an option because of the totally different structure...
> >
> >Would it be possible for one person to make those changes or would it
> > require the authors of all modules to recode?
> >  
> >
> I haven't even completed by soft fax machine, and you are trying to be
> it completely useless. :-) Think about that. What you are suggesting
> is not really a satisfactory solution to anything, but certainly
> breaks things. :-\
> 

Is this English?!

my soft fax?

make it completely useless?

Okay, I think I understand you now...

This surely wouldn't concern your code unless your code does it's 
transmission via IAX, SIP, OpenH.323 etc?

And unless I'm gravely mistaken fax won't work over IP anyway...

Matt Riddell



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list