[Asterisk-Users] system reboot often?
Richard Scobie
r.scobie at clear.net.nz
Thu Aug 26 01:02:47 MST 2004
Michael George wrote:
>
> Well, we only want 3 TDM400s: 4 FXO and 8 FXS. That will fit in nearly any
> desktop PC. That's not the scale that should require multiple boxes.
>
> But the question is where does the IRQ sharing instability creep in? I would
> think that *someone* out there would have a * box with 2-4 Digium cards in it
> that might be willing to share their experience.
>
> If the Digium cards can only be reliably run in a machine with only 1 or 2 of
> them, then I need to know so we can plan appropriately.
As Rich alluded to, it's a bit of a lottery.
I have two identical P4 2.4 boxes with Intel 845 chipsets running
updated, stripped down Redhat 7.3 and custom compiled kernels containing
nothing more than is required for asterisk in a headless, ssh access
only situation. All onboard sound, USB etc. is disabled in the BIOS.
One box has 3 x TDM400P - 2 x FXO and 8 x FXS (latest rev) all on
individual IRQs. Until a couple of months ago it had 2 x X100P and 8 x
TDM400 FXS and required driver reloads about every couple of months over
a 1 year period. I replaced the 2 X100s with the TDM FXOs for a few
reasons including a hoped for improvement in reliability.
In the 2 months since, I have had to reload the drivers once - the logs
showed 4 error mesages, "Ouch, part reset, restoring reality" for each
of the ports on one of the FXS cards.
The second box has a single TDM with 4 x FXO which is IAX2 trunked to
the first. It originally had 2 x X100Ps and gave no problems at all for
a year. In the 2 months since replacing with the single TDM, the drivers
have needed reloading once, with no sign of any errors in logs.
Apart from the above, I have been very happy the system and have had no
echo problems.
Regards,
Richard
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list