[Asterisk-Users] system reboot often?

Richard Scobie r.scobie at clear.net.nz
Thu Aug 26 01:02:47 MST 2004



Michael George wrote:

> 
> Well, we only want 3 TDM400s: 4 FXO and 8 FXS.  That will fit in nearly any
> desktop PC.  That's not the scale that should require multiple boxes.
> 
> But the question is where does the IRQ sharing instability creep in?  I would
> think that *someone* out there would have a * box with 2-4 Digium cards in it
> that might be willing to share their experience.
> 
> If the Digium cards can only be reliably run in a machine with only 1 or 2 of
> them, then I need to know so we can plan appropriately.

As Rich alluded to, it's a bit of a lottery.

I have two identical P4 2.4 boxes with Intel 845 chipsets running 
updated, stripped down Redhat 7.3 and custom compiled kernels containing 
nothing more than is required for asterisk in a headless, ssh access 
only situation. All onboard sound, USB etc. is disabled in the BIOS.

One box has 3 x TDM400P - 2 x FXO and 8 x FXS (latest rev) all on 
individual IRQs. Until a couple of months ago it had 2 x X100P and 8 x 
TDM400 FXS and required driver reloads about every couple of months over 
a 1 year period. I replaced the 2 X100s with the TDM FXOs for a few 
reasons including a hoped for improvement in reliability.

In the 2 months since, I have had to reload the drivers once - the logs 
showed 4 error mesages, "Ouch, part reset, restoring reality" for each 
of the ports on one of the FXS cards.

The second box has a single TDM with 4 x FXO which is IAX2 trunked to 
the first. It originally had 2 x X100Ps and gave no problems at all for 
a year. In the 2 months since replacing with the single TDM, the drivers 
have needed reloading once, with no sign of any errors in logs.

Apart from the above, I have been very happy the system and have had no 
echo problems.

Regards,

Richard




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list