[Asterisk-Users] RE: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #3408 - 12 msgs

Jain, Sonal Sonal.Jain at Sterlingbancorp.com
Mon Apr 12 14:44:22 MST 2004


I am looking to install a web interface for Asterisk to transfer calls and look who's on the phone. If anybody has a working web interface please let me know. I installed the www.asternic.com (operator)
But when I bring up my web browser it says transferring data and does not bring a browser.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com]  On Behalf Of asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com
Sent:	Monday, April 12, 2004 5:27 PM
To:	asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject:	Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #3408 - 12 msgs

Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to
	asterisk-users at lists.digium.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
	asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: G.723 (Eric Wieling)
   2. RE: G.723 (Steven Critchfield)
   3. Re: Voicemail storage in DB (James H. Cloos Jr.)
   4. Voicemail config from database (AJ Grinnell)
   5. oob to inband dtmf over rtp (James H. Cloos Jr.)
   6. OT appologies to list (Linus Surguy)
   7. Re: OT appologies to list (Brian Cuthie)
   8. Zapateller issues (Mark Phillips)
   9. RE: Zapateller issues (Sean Cheesman)
  10. RE: Zapateller issues (Darrin Johnson)
  11. Re: Re: Voicemail storage in DB (James H. Thompson)
  12. Re[2]: [Asterisk-Users] OT appologies to list (Stephen Karrington)

--__--__--

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:08:06 -0500
From: Eric Wieling <eric at fnords.org>
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G.723
Reply-To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com

Todd Wallace wrote:

> Is it at all possible? 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 12:31 PM
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G.723
> 
> Todd Wallace wrote:
> 
>>Is there an easy/cheap way to add g.723 to Asterisk?  I have added 
>>g.729 and need g.723.
> 
> 
> No.

Once you pay the G723, patent holders their money I'm pretty sure the 
unoptimized ITU sample code for the G723.1 codec can be added to 
Asterisk pretty easily.  But since it's not optimized don't expect to be 
able to send many G723.1 calls thru Asterisk if you are transcoding.  Of 
course, if you are NOT transcoing, then this whole thread is moot since 
Asterisk already supports G723.1 passtthru.

See this message in the mailing list archives: 
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2003-August/001317.html

You can also pay the $30 or so to the ITU to get a copy of the G723.1 
specification and sample source code for the codec, but that does not 
license you to use the codec, you still need to license it from the 
patent holders.

This issue has been discusse before.  You didn't find this information 
when you searched the Asterisk mailing list archives?

--Eric

--__--__--

Message: 2
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] G.723
From: Steven Critchfield <critch at basesys.com>
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:16:34 -0500
Reply-To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com

On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 12:47, Todd Wallace wrote:
> Is it at all possible? 

Technically it is possible, financially/legally it isn't. Search the
archives for exact problems with patent holders in the technology and
why they won't talk to you for less than a huge stack of bills.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 12:31 PM
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G.723
> 
> Todd Wallace wrote:
> > Is there an easy/cheap way to add g.723 to Asterisk?  I have added 
> > g.729 and need g.723.
> 
> No.

-- 
Steven Critchfield  <critch at basesys.com>


--__--__--

Message: 3
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
From: "James H. Cloos Jr." <cloos at jhcloos.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 14:19:23 -0400
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Voicemail storage in DB
Reply-To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com

>>>>> "WipeOut" == WipeOut  <wipe_out at users.sourceforge.net> writes:

WipeOut> Have you thought of mounting the spool directolr on an NFS
WipeOut> file server ... [I am] not sure if there would be any file
WipeOut> locking issues..

Yes, there would be.  This is the same issue as using nfs mail spools
with maildir style storage.  W/o locking there is no way to guarantee
that two servers do not create the same vm file on top of one another.

The best bet for the OP is to write support for storing the files
into the sql db.  I'd suggest using two tables: one will have the
metadata (timestamp, to, from, a seq id, et al) and the 2nd would
have an index that is the seq id from the 2st table & a blob that
contains the audio data.

Separating them like that provides for better optimization by
the dbm, whether that is mysql, pgsql (my preference), ibmdb2,
firebird, oracle or whatever.

I'd extimate the code would take just a few hours to write
and debug.  Surely less than a coder-week.

-JimC
-- 
James H. Cloos, Jr. <cloos at jhcloos.com> <http://jhcloos.com>

--__--__--

Message: 4
From: "AJ Grinnell" <agrinnell at crt.net>
To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 14:29:33 -0400
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail config from database
Reply-To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com

Any help with this will be greatly appreciated. When re-compiling * to
include voicemail access from a MySQL database, I recieve the follwing
error. Anybody know how I can fix this? Am I missing packages somewhere?

app_voicemail.c:44:25: mysql/mysql.h: No such file or directory
In file included from app_voicemail.c:247:
mysql-vm-routines.h:7: parse error before '*' token
mysql-vm-routines.h:7: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of
`dbhandler'
mysql-vm-routines.h:7: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
mysql-vm-routines.h: In function `mysql_login':
mysql-vm-routines.h:18: warning: implicit declaration of function
`mysql_init'
mysql-vm-routines.h:18: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer
without a cast
mysql-vm-routines.h:19: warning: implicit declaration of function
`mysql_real_connect'
mysql-vm-routines.h: In function `mysql_logout':
mysql-vm-routines.h:29: warning: implicit declaration of function
`mysql_close'
mysql-vm-routines.h: In function `find_user':
mysql-vm-routines.h:35: `MYSQL_RES' undeclared (first use in this function)
mysql-vm-routines.h:35: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
mysql-vm-routines.h:35: for each function it appears in.)
mysql-vm-routines.h:35: `result' undeclared (first use in this function)
mysql-vm-routines.h:36: `MYSQL_ROW' undeclared (first use in this function)
mysql-vm-routines.h:36: parse error before "rowval"
mysql-vm-routines.h:37: `MYSQL_FIELD' undeclared (first use in this
function)
mysql-vm-routines.h:37: `fields' undeclared (first use in this function)
mysql-vm-routines.h:69: warning: implicit declaration of function
`mysql_query'
mysql-vm-routines.h:70: warning: implicit declaration of function
`mysql_store_result'
mysql-vm-routines.h:71: `rowval' undeclared (first use in this function)
mysql-vm-routines.h:71: warning: implicit declaration of function
`mysql_fetch_row'
mysql-vm-routines.h:72: warning: implicit declaration of function
`mysql_num_fields'
mysql-vm-routines.h:73: warning: implicit declaration of function
`mysql_fetch_fields'
mysql-vm-routines.h:90: warning: implicit declaration of function
`mysql_free_result'
make[1]: *** [app_voicemail.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk/apps'
make: *** [subdirs] Error 1

AJ Grinnell
Network Operations Technician
CRT/ Arialink Broadband
1223 Turner Street, Suite A
Lansing, MI 48906
517.346.5041
517.492.1321 direct


--__--__--

Message: 5
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
From: "James H. Cloos Jr." <cloos at jhcloos.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 14:34:37 -0400
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] oob to inband dtmf over rtp
Reply-To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com

Are there any known problems converting dtmf from oob over iax2 to
inband over rtp/ulaw?

Obviously it works when converting to inband over pri/ulaw et al,
but how about rtp?

I've got packet traces that confirm that 2833 packets are properly
generated when I have 2833 configured for the rtp link, but the other
side seems to be ignoring those packets.  So I tried inband on that
link; nothing was able to recognize my dtmf there either.

I have to presume that either oob->inband is broken for -> rtp 
or it is broken w/o a zap timing source....

-JimC
-- 
James H. Cloos, Jr. <cloos at jhcloos.com> <http://jhcloos.com>

--__--__--

Message: 6
From: "Linus Surguy" <linus at magrathea-telecom.co.uk>
To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:30:40 +0100
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] OT appologies to list
Reply-To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com

[I'm sorry to trouble the list with this, but this is the only way I know to
contact the person concerned]

This message is for Stephen Karrington - it appears that you have
over-agressive 'spam' filters and we can no longer email you. Please rectify
this if we are to have meaningful conversation!

The original message was received
from Linus Surguy <linus at magrathea-telecom.co.uk>

   ----- This message has been blocked by our spam filter. -----
   ----- If this has been a mistake, please contact        -----
   ----- the recipient through other means.                -----

Undelivered message for: <"Stephen Karrington" <sk at dreamtime.net>>
         (reason: 550 Spam blocked)

----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 Spam blocked

>>>> DATA
>From linus at magrathea-telecom.co.uk  Mon Apr 12 15:23:04 2004
Received: from idoru.world.co.uk (idoru.world.co.uk [213.166.5.65])
by sky.dreamtime.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3CJN3Ve093074
for <sk at dreamtime.net>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:23:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from news.world.co.uk (office-gw.magrathea-systems.co.uk
[213.162.109.118])
by idoru.world.co.uk (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i3CJMwc15379
for <sk at dreamtime.net>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:58 +0100
Received: from molly (molly.world.co.uk [10.0.0.2])
by news.world.co.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with SMTP id i3CJMtDk006598
for <sk at dreamtime.net>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:55 +0100
Message-ID: <002701c420c3$90d1da00$0200000a at world.co.uk>
From: "Linus Surguy" <linus at magrathea-telecom.co.uk>
To: "Stephen Karrington" <sk at dreamtime.net>
References: <001601c420b3$1955ba60$0200000a at world.co.uk>
<243312682.20040412194404 at dreamtime.net>
Subject: Re: Re[4]: [Asterisk-Users] Who has access numbers in the UK and
Germany?
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200


--__--__--

Message: 7
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:42:27 -0400
From: Brian Cuthie <brian at systemix.com>
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT appologies to list
Reply-To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com


There's more than a little irony here, given that one of their products 
is called "Email Blaster."

-brian

Linus Surguy wrote:

>[I'm sorry to trouble the list with this, but this is the only way I know to
>contact the person concerned]
>
>This message is for Stephen Karrington - it appears that you have
>over-agressive 'spam' filters and we can no longer email you. Please rectify
>this if we are to have meaningful conversation!
>
>The original message was received
>from Linus Surguy <linus at magrathea-telecom.co.uk>
>
>   ----- This message has been blocked by our spam filter. -----
>   ----- If this has been a mistake, please contact        -----
>   ----- the recipient through other means.                -----
>
>Undelivered message for: <"Stephen Karrington" <sk at dreamtime.net>>
>         (reason: 550 Spam blocked)
>
>----- Transcript of session follows -----
>550 Spam blocked
>
>  
>
>>>>>DATA
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>From linus at magrathea-telecom.co.uk  Mon Apr 12 15:23:04 2004
>Received: from idoru.world.co.uk (idoru.world.co.uk [213.166.5.65])
>by sky.dreamtime.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3CJN3Ve093074
>for <sk at dreamtime.net>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:23:04 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from news.world.co.uk (office-gw.magrathea-systems.co.uk
>[213.162.109.118])
>by idoru.world.co.uk (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i3CJMwc15379
>for <sk at dreamtime.net>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:58 +0100
>Received: from molly (molly.world.co.uk [10.0.0.2])
>by news.world.co.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with SMTP id i3CJMtDk006598
>for <sk at dreamtime.net>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:55 +0100
>Message-ID: <002701c420c3$90d1da00$0200000a at world.co.uk>
>From: "Linus Surguy" <linus at magrathea-telecom.co.uk>
>To: "Stephen Karrington" <sk at dreamtime.net>
>References: <001601c420b3$1955ba60$0200000a at world.co.uk>
><243312682.20040412194404 at dreamtime.net>
>Subject: Re: Re[4]: [Asterisk-Users] Who has access numbers in the UK and
>Germany?
>Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:59 +0100
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>  
>


--__--__--

Message: 8
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:47:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Mark Phillips" <kc2eni at nyc-ares.org>
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Zapateller issues
Reply-To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com

Hi All,

In theory if I do this;

exten => s,1,Zapateller(nocallerid)
exten => s,2,Privacymanager
exten => s,3,Dial(a bunch of SIP extensions)

My callers should only hear the anti-telemarketing tones if they call from
a line that has no caller*ID and then get offered an opportunity to enter
it, right?

What I'm finding is that in the event of no CID the caller gets dumped
into the Privacymanager which then passes the call onto the next step
regardless of  their input of details. At no time do I hear the tones.

I tried,

exten => s,1,Zapateller(answer|nocallerid)
exten => s,2,Privacymanager
exten => s,3,Dial(a bunch of SIP extensions)

But then every call was answered regardless of CID and the tones were heard.

Any ideas?




G7LTT/KC2ENI
Mark Phillips

--__--__--

Message: 9
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Zapateller issues
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 14:54:58 -0500
From: "Sean Cheesman" <scheesman at macarthur-group.com>
To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Reply-To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com

If I remember correctly (and I could be wrong) I think you have to
answer the line first...

exten =3D> s,1,Answer
exten =3D> s,2,Zapateller(nocallerid)
exten =3D> s,3,Privacymanager
exten =3D> s,4,Dial(a bunch of SIP extensions)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Phillips [mailto:kc2eni at nyc-ares.org]=20
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 2:47 PM
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Zapateller issues
>=20
>=20
> Hi All,
>=20
> In theory if I do this;
>=20
> exten =3D> s,1,Zapateller(nocallerid)
> exten =3D> s,2,Privacymanager
> exten =3D> s,3,Dial(a bunch of SIP extensions)
>=20
> My callers should only hear the anti-telemarketing tones if=20
> they call from a line that has no caller*ID and then get=20
> offered an opportunity to enter it, right?
>=20
> What I'm finding is that in the event of no CID the caller=20
> gets dumped into the Privacymanager which then passes the=20
> call onto the next step regardless of  their input of=20
> details. At no time do I hear the tones.
>=20
> I tried,
>=20
> exten =3D> s,1,Zapateller(answer|nocallerid)
> exten =3D> s,2,Privacymanager
> exten =3D> s,3,Dial(a bunch of SIP extensions)
>=20
> But then every call was answered regardless of CID and the=20
> tones were heard.
>=20
> Any ideas?
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> G7LTT/KC2ENI
> Mark Phillips
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com=20
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/aster> isk-users
> To=20
> UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   =20
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--__--__--

Message: 10
From: "Darrin Johnson" <djohnson at isdomaininc.com>
To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Zapateller issues
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 12:59:03 -0700
Reply-To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com

Or you could specify the answer in the Zapateller line like:

...
exten => s,2,Zapateller(answer|nocallerid)
....



-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Sean Cheesman
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 12:55 PM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Zapateller issues

If I remember correctly (and I could be wrong) I think you have to
answer the line first...

exten => s,1,Answer
exten => s,2,Zapateller(nocallerid)
exten => s,3,Privacymanager
exten => s,4,Dial(a bunch of SIP extensions)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Phillips [mailto:kc2eni at nyc-ares.org] 
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 2:47 PM
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Zapateller issues
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> In theory if I do this;
> 
> exten => s,1,Zapateller(nocallerid)
> exten => s,2,Privacymanager
> exten => s,3,Dial(a bunch of SIP extensions)
> 
> My callers should only hear the anti-telemarketing tones if 
> they call from a line that has no caller*ID and then get 
> offered an opportunity to enter it, right?
> 
> What I'm finding is that in the event of no CID the caller 
> gets dumped into the Privacymanager which then passes the 
> call onto the next step regardless of  their input of 
> details. At no time do I hear the tones.
> 
> I tried,
> 
> exten => s,1,Zapateller(answer|nocallerid)
> exten => s,2,Privacymanager
> exten => s,3,Dial(a bunch of SIP extensions)
> 
> But then every call was answered regardless of CID and the 
> tones were heard.
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> G7LTT/KC2ENI
> Mark Phillips
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com 
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/aster> isk-users
> To 
> UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




--__--__--

Message: 11
From: "James H. Thompson" <jht at lj.net>
To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Voicemail storage in DB
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 09:58:12 -1000
Reply-To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com



> >>>>> "WipeOut" == WipeOut  <wipe_out at users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> 
> WipeOut> Have you thought of mounting the spool directolr on an NFS
> WipeOut> file server ... [I am] not sure if there would be any file
> WipeOut> locking issues..
> 
> Yes, there would be.  This is the same issue as using nfs mail spools
> with maildir style storage.  W/o locking there is no way to guarantee
> that two servers do not create the same vm file on top of one another.

You could use NFS with the Maildir alogrithm or something similar to avoid the need for locking.






--__--__--

Message: 12
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 22:18:42 +0200
From: Stephen Karrington <sk at dreamtime.net>
Organization: Dreamtime.net Inc.
To: Brian Cuthie <brian at systemix.com>
Cc: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: Re[2]: [Asterisk-Users] OT appologies to list
Reply-To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com

Hello,

Email Blaster is spam proof and permission only. Its just the name
that gets people excited :)

Sincerely,

Stephen Karrington
Dreamtime.net Inc.
http://www.dreamtime.net
http://www.emailblaster.us

Corporate Office
101 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

Voice - 877-203-9308
Fax - 310-943-2606

Dreamtime is your global choice for worldwide communication services, viral  marketing software and direct sales
channel automation.

===8<==============Original message text===============

There's more than a little irony here, given that one of their products 
is called "Email Blaster."

-brian

Linus Surguy wrote:

>[I'm sorry to trouble the list with this, but this is the only way I know to
>contact the person concerned]
>
>This message is for Stephen Karrington - it appears that you have
>over-agressive 'spam' filters and we can no longer email you. Please rectify
>this if we are to have meaningful conversation!
>
>The original message was received
>from Linus Surguy <linus at magrathea-telecom.co.uk>
>
>   ----- This message has been blocked by our spam filter. -----
>   ----- If this has been a mistake, please contact        -----
>   ----- the recipient through other means.                -----
>
>Undelivered message for: <"Stephen Karrington" <sk at dreamtime.net>>
>         (reason: 550 Spam blocked)
>
>----- Transcript of session follows -----
>550 Spam blocked
>
>  
>
>>>>>DATA
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>From linus at magrathea-telecom.co.uk  Mon Apr 12 15:23:04 2004
>Received: from idoru.world.co.uk (idoru.world.co.uk [213.166.5.65])
>by sky.dreamtime.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3CJN3Ve093074
>for <sk at dreamtime.net>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:23:04 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from news.world.co.uk (office-gw.magrathea-systems.co.uk
>[213.162.109.118])
>by idoru.world.co.uk (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i3CJMwc15379
>for <sk at dreamtime.net>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:58 +0100
>Received: from molly (molly.world.co.uk [10.0.0.2])
>by news.world.co.uk (8.12.0/8.12.0) with SMTP id i3CJMtDk006598
>for <sk at dreamtime.net>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:55 +0100
>Message-ID: <002701c420c3$90d1da00$0200000a at world.co.uk>
>From: "Linus Surguy" <linus at magrathea-telecom.co.uk>
>To: "Stephen Karrington" <sk at dreamtime.net>
>References: <001601c420b3$1955ba60$0200000a at world.co.uk>
><243312682.20040412194404 at dreamtime.net>
>Subject: Re: Re[4]: [Asterisk-Users] Who has access numbers in the UK and
>Germany?
>Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:22:59 +0100
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


===8<===========End of original message text===========



--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


End of Asterisk-Users Digest





More information about the asterisk-users mailing list