[Asterisk-Users] G729 experiences..

[Matthew Hardeman]

The last time I checked, the Snom 200's were so out-tasked by the G.729
implementation on them that their U.I. became non-responsive during the
call...  Serious performance issues there.  They may have come up with a
clever fix, but it's been a while since I've looked into it...  At the time,
what I saw was scary.

Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "WipeOut" <wipe_out at lycos.co.uk>
To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 4:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 experiences..


> Matthew Hardeman wrote:
>
> >It's ok...  The voice sounds fine.  It's superior to most cell phone
> >calls, anyway.
> >
> >I've used it with the Cisco 7960's without any trouble.
> >
> >You can use asterisk in any way that uses it in console mode.  Safe
> >asterisk does so, so you can use it.  This may be otherwise fixed, but
> >I'm not sure.  As safe asterisk works, I don't worry about it.
> >
> >Voicemail will use one license for each output stream it has to
> >transcode.  Therefore, it is preferable if you are using G729 to only
> >write out one format of voicemail recording.  I use WAV49, which is
> >small like GSM, but easier to play on default windows installs with any
> >kind of decent media player installed.  It *does* properly release the
> >license when done.  (At least now, on my system, it does.)
> >
> >Matt Hardeman
> >PaperSoft
> >
> >
> >
> Has anyone used the Digim G.729 codec with SNOM 200 phones?
>
> I have heard people have had success with the Grandstream phones..
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>