[Asterisk-Users] SS7 signaling/Softswitch

Bruce Ferrell bferrell at baywinds.org
Sun Oct 26 02:58:15 MST 2003


Man, getting the "masses of messy details" out in the open is what this 
is all about.  Let it flow and we all get better and can do better!

Steve Underwood wrote:
> OK. If are talking about masses of messy details, then I agree with you.
> 
> Regards,
> Steve
> 
> CW_ASN wrote:
> 
>> Steve:
>>
>> Ok, if you like to hear about Cisco BTS10200 and Cisco ITP 
>> configurations,
>> good... I have no problems with that...
>> We will discuss HERE all the configurations needed to bring up a CCS7 
>> links
>> in ITP, how load a SPC formats, and how can I add an TGCP route in BTS...
>> Sure! Why not?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gus
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Steve Underwood" <steveu at coppice.org>
>> To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 2:14 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SS7 signaling/Softswitch
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>>> Interesting. Someone thinks that a strategic use for * should be off
>>> this list. Someone thought my FAX modem for * should be off this list.
>>> However, nobody seems to think a 1000 messages about Grandstream phones
>>> should be off this list.
>>>
>>> Personally I would welcome seeing more of what people are doing in the
>>> softswitch area.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> CW_ASN wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>> Juan:
>>>>
>>>> I think that we must continue with the discussion out of this list.
>>>>
>>>> "Te contacto por fuera de la lista."
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Gus
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Juan J. Sierralta P." <juanjo at atmlab.utfsm.cl>
>>>> To: "Asterisk Users" <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
>>>> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 7:50 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SS7 signaling/Softswitch
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 16:29, CW_ASN - Gus wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>>>>
>>>>>> No, its not 100% accured. * can be used as Softswitch in MGCP... all
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>
>>>> "good"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>>> softswitchs uses MGCP/TGCP/NCS to manage each endpoint. I have 1 * 
>>>>>> box
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>
>>>> under
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>>> test with Cisco BTS10200, and * works very fine with this softswitch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>
>>>> You
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>>> could use SIP too...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you explain that setup a bit more ?
>>>>> You mean that BTS is controling the * box using MGCP or the inverse ?
>>>>> Cause a I have an * box using a BTS+AS5300 as its PTSN gateway using
>>>>> SIP. But the BTS receives the SS7 signaling(via an ITS i think) and
>>>>> controls the AS5300 via MGCP. Then the * box it is another SIP route
>>>>> inside the BTS.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Juanjo sin .sig
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 





More information about the asterisk-users mailing list