[Asterisk-Users] 2 4-port T1 cards

[Mike D.]

> 
> was that mysql 3.23.x or  4.0.x ?
> michael

I did most of my mysql work some time ago with 3.x.  I have, however,
installed mysql 4.0.12 since I'm working on a CASE tool which needs to
support both mysql and postgresql.  I'll be the first to admit that
mysql has probably improved (a lot?) since then.  I was simply relating
my experience with both mysql and postgresql.

> 
> 
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
> 
> On 28.05.2003 at 16:18 mdiehl at dominion.dyndns.org wrote:
> 
> >> My example of heavy load where mysql could not even begin to handle the 
> >> situation was a project with real time stock market data streamed in as 
> >> bids and offers and trades happened, statistics computed from that in
> >real 
> >> time, database kept in sync live, and charts and graphs plotted in real 
> >> time for users on the site. Now that situation had more than its share
> >of 
> >> inserts and updates, and a massive wad of historical data being kept
> >just 
> >> to add to the fun.
> >
> >...and I can even top that.  I had an Intrusion Detection System proof
> >of concept which logged to a Postgresql database.  This database
> >received 10-15 Million inserts a day and I was required to keep 90 day's
> >worth of data. Most of the elects were done in batch during "slow" times
> >at 
> >night.  Some of the queries were expected to run in "near-real time."
> >And might I also add that postgres did just fine...
> >
> >> Might I add for record that postgres did just fine.
> >
> >Mike Diehl.
> >_______________________________________________
> >Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>