[Asterisk-Users] SIPPROXD for SIP thru NAT

[John Todd]

OK, Asterisk does that out of the box.  Install it, read the docs, 
and jump in the IRC channel when you get to the point where you think 
it doesn't work.  :)

JT


>Froilan and John
>
>
>Jasomi is a little more the 10k buck for 25 simultaneous calls , but  works
>fanthastic what I need is a "device" that works as a STUN SERVER this fits
>exatly but the ATA-186 does not support STUN , what I need is to have
>NOTHING on the far end (customer) only the ATA-186 and nothing to confiure
>on the far end, just sell an ATA (for example) at best buy , plug and play
>(obioulsy  a LAB-Config previous), and can be able to receive and send calls
>from that side.
>
>Regards
>
>Humberto
>
>-----Mensaje original-----
>De: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com
>[mailto:asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com]En nombre de Florian
>Overkamp
>Enviado el: Jueves, 08 de Mayo de 2003 05:25 a.m.
>Para: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
>Asunto: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIPPROXD for SIP thru NAT
>
>
>John,
>
>thanks very much for your elaboration on this issue.
>
>At 00:59 8-5-2003 -0700, you wrote:
>>If you're asking about proxy-to-proxy functionality, I have no idea. But
>>if all you're concerned about is NAT'ed UA's, then I'd say that Asterisk
>>is there right now.  There are other issues which make make it less
>>reliable than the Jasomi solution (there are others in this market, as
>>well) but that is not the specific question you asked.
>
>True, but can we identify these issues ? I'd like to compose a checklist of
>requirements or caveats regarding voip-customers in a rogue environment
>(i.e. no control over NAT etc).
>
>>hash the "open source" vs. "commercial" product argument
>>here.  Competition is good, no matter what the force is pushing the
>>process.  However, the market for NAT traversal devices is pretty
>>specialized and technical, and Asterisk will make big inroads with the
>>savvy technicians who install that equipment.  I'm a case in point - I
>
>Point taken.
>
>>Sorry for the long-winded talk; I have nothing better to do while waiting
>>for downloads/compiles right now.  :)
>
>No problem at all - I'm very happy to think deeply into issues such as
>this, since they closely relate to the levels of support one would need to
>supply to voip-customers.
>
>Florian
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users