[Asterisk-Users] Re: transfer with threeway calling
asteriskuser at aktzero.com
Thu Dec 18 08:05:37 MST 2003
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cees de Groot" <cg at tric.nl>
To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 7:58 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: transfer with threeway calling
> Michiel Betel <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> said:
> >I agree with Cees, however, not wanting to throw away the 3 way
> >conference feature, but giving the user a config choice might be best.
> >Therefore I'm now testing a patch which will allow/disallow the 3 way
> >conference. When disallowed it will fallback to "normal old fashioned"
> >PBX behaviour namely FLASH puts caller on hold, FLASH again gets caller
> Good. Choice is Good ;-)
> Cees de Groot http://www.tric.nl <cg at tric.nl>
> tric, the new way helpdesk/ticketing software, VoIP/CTI,
> web applications, custom development
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
Shouldn't this be an feature of the parking app?
700, Normal Park
701, Personal Park/EasyRetreive
I transfer to 701.
* says: "Next Available hold is 1"
I dial 1.
* parks caller and hangs up on me.
I hang up.
I dial 701.
* says: "Next Available hold is 2" (or * knows this isn't a transfer, and
reads off the list of holds in use, possibly including callerid)
I dial 1.
* puts the call back together, or hangs up and rings that line back to me.
Criticism and further discussion appreciated. No flames please, this is just
Andrew Thompson http://aktzero.com/
Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy. Notice how
restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The opinions
stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise.
More information about the asterisk-users