[Asterisk-Users] Secondary gatekeeper support by asterisk h323 drivers

[Jeremy McNamara]

H.323 is no longer part of my own network, so I no longer have a built 
in method to burn lots of time beating up a dying protocol and 
unfortunately,  I have to dedicate myself to projects that directly 
generate revenue. I'll see what I can do, but I can make no promises.

Sorry,

Jeremy McNamara


P.S. I could not duplicate any crash using my own (proprietary) 
gatekeeper. Plus, I cannot do a thing without debug information.





Michael Ulitskiy wrote:

>Great! Thanks, Michael.
>Jeremy, what do you think?
>
>Michael
>
>On Tuesday 26 August 2003 07:53 am, Michael Manousos wrote:
>  
>
>>Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I'm wondering if there are any plans on adding secondary gatekeeper
>>>support to asterisk h323 channel drivers.
>>>      
>>>
>>Nice to have something like this.
>>I 'll add it to the TODO features of asterisk-oh323.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Also I've noticed that chan_h323 is crashing asterisk at startup if 
>>>primary gatekeeper is not available. Wouldn't it be a more correct 
>>>behavior if it doesn't crashing but continue registration attempts in
>>>the background? Didn't test it with chan_oh323.
>>>      
>>>
>>There is no such problem with chan_oh323.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Thank you.
>>>
>>>Michael
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Michael.
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>>>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>>      
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>  
>