[Asterisk-Users] Xten - Free windows SIP client

[Simon Woodhead]

Same here Michael and the PocketPC version seems unaudible with any codec; early days trying that though.

Simon

-----Original Message-----
   >From: "Michael Van Donselaar"<mvand at neb.rr.com>
   >Sent: 22/04/03 04:10:24
   >To: "asterisk-users at lists.digium.com"<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
   >Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Xten - Free windows SIP client
   >
   >On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:35:08 -0700, you wrote:
   >
   >>I have tried the Xten this morning, the sound is very good!
   >>
   >
   >I have gotten good results with ulaw codec, but when I use GSM,  I get
   >choppy sound, like I'm talking into a fan.  Anyone else get this?
   >
   >>john
   >>
   >>----- Original Message ----- 
   >>From: "Clay Graner" <Clay at CTITec.com>
   >>To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
   >>Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 10:07 AM
   >>Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Xten - Free windows SIP client
   >>
   >>
   >>> If xten networks would add IAX capability that would be even better. :-)
   >>> 
   >>> 
   >>> -----Original Message-----
   >>> From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com
   >>> [mailto:as?terisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of it
   >>> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 12:23 PM
   >>> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
   >>> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Xten - Free windows SIP client
   >>> 
   >>> If it could be embeded into our windows applications,then that would be
   >>> wonderful!
   >>> 
   >>> john
   >>> 
   >>> ----- Original Message -----
   >>> From: "William Walsh" <william at wxw.org>
   >>> To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
   >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 6:26 PM
   >>> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Xten - Free windows SIP client
   >>> 
   >>> 
   >>> > On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 15:58, Jim Flagg wrote:
   >>> > > http://www.xten.com/products.php
   >>> > >
   >>> > > Anybody using it with *?
   >>> > >
   >>> > > William Walsh was beta testing it, not sure if he used it with *.
   >>> > >
   >>> http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-March/008265.html
   >>> >
   >>> > I did.  It worked very well, but the issue with it still not
   >>> supporting
   >>> > selectable sound device configuration in the PC Version is reason
   >>> enough
   >>> > to reject it for regular use at the moment IMO.  If they solve that
   >>> > issue, then it will be, again IMO, the best SIP softphone for the PC
   >>> > market.  And I've done more than enough testing of SIP softphones to
   >>> be
   >>> > able to say that (from an end user point of view)  :)
   >>> >
   >>> > It's attractive, easy to use, fully functional, and is from a company
   >>> > that has been very responsive to customers (at least in their beta
   >>> > program).
   >>> >
   >>> > --
   >>> > William Walsh <william at wxw.org>
   >>> > Jabber: william at wxw.biz
   >>> >
   >>> >
   >>> > _______________________________________________
   >>> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
   >>> > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
   >>> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   >>> >
   >>> 
   >>> 
   >>> 
   >>> _______________________________________________
   >>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
   >>> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
   >>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   >>> 
   >>
   >>_______________________________________________
   >>Asterisk-Users mailing list
   >>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
   >>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   >
   >
   >_______________________________________________
   >Asterisk-Users mailing list
   >Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
   >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   >